Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 May 1;6(5):549-556. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.7572.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice for many conditions. Conditional devices and novel protocols for imaging patients with legacy cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have increased access to MRI in patients with devices. However, the presence of abandoned leads remains an absolute contraindication.
To assess if the performance of an MRI in the presence of an abandoned CIED lead is safe and whether there are deleterious effects on concomitant active CIED leads.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included consecutive CIED recipients undergoing 1.5-T MRI with at least 1 abandoned lead between January 2013 and June 2020. MRI scans were performed at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. No patients were excluded.
CIEDs were reprogrammed based on patient-specific pacing needs. Electrocardiography telemetry and pulse oximetry were monitored continuously, and live contact with the patient throughout the scan via visual and voice contact was performed if possible. After completion of the MRI, CIED evaluation was repeated and programming returned to baseline or to a clinically appropriate setting.
Variation in pre- and post-MRI capture threshold of 50% or more, ventricular sensing 40% or more, and lead impedance 30% or more, as well as clinical sequelae such as pain and sustained tachyarrhythmia were considered significant. Long-term follow-up lead-related data were analyzed if available.
A total of 139 consecutive patients (110 men [79%]) with a mean (SD) age of 65.6 (13.4) years underwent 200 MRIs of various anatomic regions including the thorax. Repeat examinations were common with a maximum of 16 examinations for 1 patient. There was a total of 243 abandoned leads with a mean (SD) of 1.22 (0.45) per patient. The mean (SD) number of active leads was 2.04 (0.78) and 64 patients (46%) were pacemaker dependent. A transmit-receive radiofrequency coil was used in 41 patients (20.5%), all undergoing MRI of the brain. There were no abnormal vital signs or sustained tachyarrhythmias. No changes in battery voltage, power-on reset events, or changes of pacing rate were noted. CIED parameter changes including decreased right atrial sensing in 4 patients and decreased left ventricular R-wave amplitude in 1 patient were transiently noted. One patient with an abandoned subcutaneous array experienced sternal heating that subsided on premature cessation of the study.
The risk of MRI in patients with abandoned CIED leads was low in this large observational study, including patients who underwent examination of the thorax. The growing aggregate of data questions the absolute contraindication for MRI in patients with abandoned CIED leads.
磁共振成像(MRI)是许多疾病的首选成像方式。为了使带有传统心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的患者能够进行 MRI 检查,开发了一些针对这些患者的特殊设备和新型成像协议,从而提高了患有设备的患者接受 MRI 检查的机会。但是,遗留的导线仍然是绝对禁忌症。
评估在存在废弃 CIED 导联的情况下进行 MRI 是否安全,以及是否对同时存在的有源 CIED 导联产生有害影响。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究包括 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间在宾夕法尼亚大学医院进行的 1.5-T MRI 检查且至少有 1 根废弃导联的连续 CIED 受检者。MRI 扫描在此医院进行。未排除任何患者。
根据患者的特定起搏需求对 CIED 进行重新编程。连续进行心电图遥测和脉搏血氧饱和度监测,并在可能的情况下通过视觉和语音联系与患者保持联系。完成 MRI 后,重复 CIED 评估,并将编程恢复到基线或临床适当的设置。
捕获阈值变化 50%或以上,心室感知变化 40%或以上,导联阻抗变化 30%或以上,以及疼痛和持续心动过速等临床后遗症被认为是显著的。如果有可用的长期随访导线相关数据,则进行分析。
共有 139 名连续患者(110 名男性[79%])接受了各种解剖区域(包括胸部)的 200 次 MRI 检查,平均(SD)年龄为 65.6(13.4)岁。重复检查很常见,1 名患者最多进行了 16 次检查。共有 243 根废弃导联,每位患者平均(SD)为 1.22(0.45)根。平均(SD)有源导联数量为 2.04(0.78)根,64 名患者(46%)依赖起搏器。41 名患者(20.5%)使用了发射-接收射频线圈,均接受了脑部 MRI 检查。没有出现异常生命体征或持续心动过速。没有注意到电池电压、开机重置事件或起搏频率变化的改变。CIED 参数变化包括 4 名患者的右心房感知降低和 1 名患者的左心室 R 波幅度降低,但为一过性变化。1 名患有废弃皮下导联的患者出现胸骨加热,但在研究提前终止后消失。
在这项大型观察性研究中,包括接受胸部检查的患者,废弃 CIED 导联患者进行 MRI 的风险较低。越来越多的数据质疑对带有废弃 CIED 导联的患者进行 MRI 检查的绝对禁忌症。