Suppr超能文献

与动态对比增强磁共振成像相比,高分辨率三维扩散加权成像在乳腺癌检测中的效能

Efficacy of high-resolution, 3-D diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of breast cancer compared to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

作者信息

Yadav Pratiksha, Harit Saumya, Kumar Dileep

机构信息

Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, DPU, Pune, India.

Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, India.

出版信息

Pol J Radiol. 2021 May 10;86:e277-e286. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2021.106207. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of high-resolution, 3-D diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the detection of breast cancer and to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curves of DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Prospective IEC approved study included 131 breast lesions detected on mammography and breast ultrasound. Cases underwent MRI on a 3 Tesla scanner using a dedicated breast coil. T2WI, STIR, T1WI, and dynamic post contrast MR. DWI MRI with b value of 50, 800, and 1500 s/mm. Post-processing data with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculations and kinetic curves were obtained. Characteristics for lesions were analysed as per ACR BI-RADS descriptors. Final histopathological diagnosis was considered as the standard of reference. c test, -test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, pairwise comparison of ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-six (50.38%) malignant and 65 (59.62%) benign lesions were included in the study. The mean ADC of malignant lesions was 0.870 × 10 mm/s and 1.637 × 10 mm/s ( < 0.0001) for benign lesions. Sensitivity and specificity for DWI were 95.45% and 90.76%, respectively, and for DCE-MRI they were 96.97% and 87.69%, respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were obtained at 91.30% and 95.16%, respectively, in DWI while in DCE-MRI they were 88.88% and 96.61%, respectively. The AUC for ADC was 0.979. In ROC comparison of AUC for DWI 0.931 and for DCE-MRI 0.923, the difference between the areas was 0.00781 ( = 0.782).

CONCLUSIONS

High-resolution DWI is a non-contrast MRI technique, which improves the lesion detection with diagnostic performance comparable to DCE-MRI and has potential as an adjunct with screening mammography.

摘要

目的

评估高分辨率三维扩散加权成像(DWI)在乳腺癌检测中的效用,并比较DWI与动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)的敏感性、特异性及曲线下面积。

材料与方法

一项经独立伦理委员会(IEC)批准的前瞻性研究纳入了131例在乳腺钼靶和乳腺超声检查中发现的乳腺病变。所有病例均在3特斯拉扫描仪上使用专用乳腺线圈进行MRI检查。检查序列包括T2WI、短TI反转恢复序列(STIR)、T1WI以及动态对比增强MR。DWI MRI的b值分别为50、800和1500 s/mm²。通过计算表观扩散系数(ADC)并获得动力学曲线进行后处理数据。根据美国放射学会(ACR)乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)描述符分析病变特征。最终组织病理学诊断被视为参考标准。计算卡方检验、t检验、受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析、ROC曲线的成对比较、敏感性、特异性、诊断准确性以及曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

本研究纳入了66例(50.38%)恶性病变和65例(59.62%)良性病变。恶性病变的平均ADC值为0.870×10⁻³mm²/s,良性病变为1.637×10⁻³mm²/s(P<0.0001)。DWI的敏感性和特异性分别为95.45%和90.76%,DCE-MRI的敏感性和特异性分别为96.97%和87.69%。DWI的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为91.30%和95.16%,而DCE-MRI的PPV和NPV分别为88.88%和96.61%。ADC的AUC为0.979。在DWI的AUC为0.931和DCE-MRI的AUC为0.923的ROC比较中,两者面积差异为0.00781(P=0.782)。

结论

高分辨率DWI是一种非对比MRI技术,其在病变检测方面具有与DCE-MRI相当的诊断性能,并且有潜力作为乳腺钼靶筛查的辅助手段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7927/8186310/6d5a8685227b/PJR-86-44103-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验