Berner Carolin, Marculescu Rodrig, Frommlet Florian, Kurnikowski Amelie, Schairer Benjamin, Aigner Christof, Bieglmayer Christian, Hecking Manfred
Division of Nephrology & Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna.
Nephrology & Dialysis, 1st Medical Department, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kidney Med. 2021 Feb 27;3(3):343-352.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.12.015. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Management of chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder requires parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations. "Biointact" PTH immunoassays detect "whole" PTH (wPTH), whereas "intact" immunoassays measure PTH plus PTH fragments (iPTH). We aimed to determine whether longitudinal changes in PTH concentrations can be evaluated using biointact and intact immunoassays alike.
Open noninterventional longitudinal cohort study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: PTH concentrations were measured quarterly up to 5 times in 102 hemodialysis patients.
PREDICTORS & TESTS COMPARED: Age, sex, phosphate levels, and others as clinical predictors for PTH trend. Tests compared were iPTH immunoassays from Siemens and Roche and wPTH immunoassays from Roche and DiaSorin.
PTH concentration trend; regression equations; test bias.
Predictive regression-to-the-mean model for PTH slope; Bland-Altman plots, Passing-Bablok regression, and reference change values for test comparisons.
wPTH concentrations were similar with both immunoassays (wPTH-Roche = 11.7 + 0.97 × wPTH-DiaSorin, = 0.99; mean ± 1.96 SD bias, 8.2 ± 43.3 pg/mL [17.5% ± 40.9%], by Bland-Altman plots). iPTH-Siemens concentrations were higher than iPTH-Roche concentrations (iPTH-Siemens = -5.4 + 1.33 × iPTH-Roche, = 0.99; mean ± 1.96 SD bias, 84.0 ± 180.2 pg/mL [21.1% ± 29.8%], by Bland-Altman plots). iPTH-Roche and iPTH-Siemens concentrations were 2- and 2.5-fold higher than wPTH concentrations, respectively. Full agreement among all 4 immunoassays in detecting both significant and insignificant changes in PTH concentrations, upward or downward from one quarter to the next, was reached in 87% of consecutive measurements. In a predictive model, baseline PTH concentrations > 199 pg/mL (wPTH-Roche), 204 pg/mL (wPTH-DiaSorin), 386 pg/mL (iPTH-Roche), and 417 pg/mL (iPTH-Siemens) correctly predicted declining PTH concentration trend in 62% to 68% of patients, but age, sex, hemodialysis vintage, and calcium and phosphate levels were no significant predictors.
Limited number of immunoassays, only 59 patients attended all quarterly samplings.
wPTH-Roche and wPTH-DiaSorin concentrations were similar, while iPTH was higher than wPTH concentrations. The iPTH-Siemens immunoassay is either higher calibrated or detects more fragments than iPTH-Roche. However, longitudinal PTH concentration changes largely coincided with all tested immunoassays.
慢性肾脏病矿物质和骨异常的管理需要检测甲状旁腺激素(PTH)浓度。“生物完整”PTH免疫测定法检测“完整”PTH(wPTH),而“完整”免疫测定法测量PTH加PTH片段(iPTH)。我们旨在确定是否可以使用生物完整和完整免疫测定法同样评估PTH浓度的纵向变化。
开放非干预纵向队列研究。
在102例血液透析患者中,每季度测量一次PTH浓度,最多测量5次。
年龄、性别、磷酸盐水平等作为PTH趋势的临床预测因素。比较的检测方法为西门子和罗氏的iPTH免疫测定法以及罗氏和索灵的wPTH免疫测定法。
PTH浓度趋势;回归方程;检测偏差。
PTH斜率的预测回归均值模型;用于检测比较的布兰德-奥特曼图、帕辛-巴布洛赫回归和参考变化值。
两种免疫测定法测得的wPTH浓度相似(wPTH-罗氏 = 11.7 + 0.97×wPTH-索灵,r = 0.99;根据布兰德-奥特曼图,平均±1.96标准差偏差为8.2±43.3 pg/mL [17.5%±40.9%])。西门子iPTH浓度高于罗氏iPTH浓度(iPTH-西门子 = -5.4 + 1.33×iPTH-罗氏,r = 0.99;根据布兰德-奥特曼图,平均±1.96标准差偏差为84.0±180.2 pg/mL [21.1%±29.8%])。罗氏iPTH和西门子iPTH浓度分别比wPTH浓度高2倍和2.5倍。在87%的连续测量中,所有4种免疫测定法在检测PTH浓度从一个季度到下一个季度的显著和不显著变化(上升或下降)方面完全一致。在一个预测模型中,基线PTH浓度>199 pg/mL(wPTH-罗氏)、204 pg/mL(wPTH-索灵)、386 pg/mL(iPTH-罗氏)和417 pg/mL(iPTH-西门子)能在62%至68%的患者中正确预测PTH浓度下降趋势,但年龄、性别、血液透析时间以及钙和磷酸盐水平不是显著的预测因素。
免疫测定法数量有限,只有59例患者参加了所有季度采样。
wPTH-罗氏和wPTH-索灵浓度相似,而iPTH高于wPTH浓度。西门子iPTH免疫测定法要么校准更高,要么比罗氏iPTH检测到更多片段。然而,PTH浓度的纵向变化在很大程度上与所有测试的免疫测定法一致。