Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Alicante General University Hospital - Alicante Institute of Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.
Clinical Medicine Department, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain.
J Med Virol. 2021 Oct;93(10):6030-6039. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27135. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
The medium-term serologic response of SARS-CoV-2 infection recovered individuals is not well known. The aims were to quantify the incidence of seropositive failure in the medium term in a cohort of patients with different COVID-19 severity and to analyze its associated factors. Patients who had recovered from mild and severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection in an Academic Spanish hospital (March 12-May 2, 2020), were tested for total anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 test; Roche Diagnostics GmbH). The non-seropositive status (seropositive failure) incidence (95% CI) was determined. Associations were tested by multiple logistic regression in a global cohort and severe pneumonia subpopulation. Of 435 patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2, a serological test was carried out in 325: 210 (64.6%) had severe pneumonia (hospitalized patients), 51 (15.7%) non-severe pneumonia (managed as outpatients), and 64 (19.7%) mild cases without pneumonia. After a median (IQR) of 76 days (70-83) from symptom onset, antibody responses may not consistently develop or reach levels sufficient to be detectable by antibody tests (non-seropositive incidence) in 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4-10.6) and 20.3% (95% CI, 12.2-31.7) of patients with and without pneumonia, respectively. Baseline independent predictors of seropositive failure were higher leukocytes and fewer days of symptoms before admission, while low glomerular filtrate and fever seem associated with serologic response. Age, comorbidity or immunosuppressive therapies (corticosteroids, tocilizumab) did not influence antibody response. In the medium-term, SARS-CoV-2 seropositive failure is not infrequent in COVID-19 recovered patients. Age, comorbidity or immunosuppressive therapies did not influence antibody response.
SARS-CoV-2 感染康复者的中期血清学反应尚不清楚。本研究旨在定量评估不同 COVID-19 严重程度患者队列中中期血清学阳性失败的发生率,并分析其相关因素。西班牙某学术医院(2020 年 3 月 12 日至 5 月 2 日)收治的 SARS-CoV-2 轻症和重症康复患者,采用电化学发光免疫分析法(罗氏 Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 检测)检测总抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体。确定非血清阳性状态(血清学阳性失败)的发生率(95%CI)。在全队列和重症肺炎亚组中通过多因素逻辑回归分析相关性。在 435 例 PCR 确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 患者中,对 325 例患者进行了血清学检测:210 例(64.6%)患有重症肺炎(住院患者),51 例(15.7%)患有非重症肺炎(门诊管理),64 例(19.7%)患有无肺炎的轻症病例。从症状出现到中位(IQR)76 天(70-83 天)后,抗体反应可能无法持续发展或达到足以通过抗体检测(非血清阳性发生率)检测到的水平(分别为 6.9%[95%CI,4.4-10.6]和 20.3%[95%CI,12.2-31.7]),患有和不患有肺炎的患者。血清学阳性失败的独立预测因素是白细胞计数较高和入院前症状天数较少,而肾小球滤过率低和发热似乎与血清学反应有关。年龄、合并症或免疫抑制治疗(皮质类固醇、托珠单抗)并未影响抗体反应。在中期,COVID-19 康复患者的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学阳性失败并不少见。年龄、合并症或免疫抑制治疗并未影响抗体反应。