Suppr超能文献

愤怒调节选择——年龄和习惯性再评价的作用。

Anger regulation choice-The role of age and habitual reappraisal.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences.

Life-Span Psychology, Universität Leipzig.

出版信息

Emotion. 2022 Oct;22(7):1639-1652. doi: 10.1037/emo0000915. Epub 2021 Jun 17.

Abstract

The ability to choose emotion regulation strategies in accordance to contextual demands, known as emotion regulation flexibility, is key to healthy adaptation. While recent investigations on spontaneous emotion regulation choice tested the effects of emotional intensity and age using standardized negative pictures with no particular emotional quality, we elicited the discrete emotion of anger with personally relevant autobiographical memories in a sample of 52 younger and 41 older adults. In addition, we included habitual reappraisal as a predictor of emotion regulation choice. Our main hypothesis was that, compared with younger adults, older adults prefer less resource-demanding emotion regulation strategies (i.e., distraction) over more resource-demanding strategies (i.e., reappraisal), particularly if older adults' habitual reappraisal is low and the to-be-regulated anger is of high intensity. Surprisingly, our findings suggest that only older adults' emotion regulation choices depend on the emotional intensity of the autobiographical memory and habitual reappraisal. Only older adults with high habitual reappraisal preferred to reappraise their anger in situations of low anger intensity but switched to the less demanding strategy of distraction in high anger memories, indicating emotion regulation flexibility. This study extends previous research by testing emotion regulation choices in natural contexts and considering regulation habits. Although we replicate previous findings of emotion regulation flexibility according to emotional intensity in anger memories for older adults with high habitual reappraisal only, our findings illustrate the relevance of reappraisal habits to emotion regulation choice in age-comparative research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

根据情境需求选择情绪调节策略的能力,即情绪调节灵活性,是健康适应的关键。虽然最近关于自发情绪调节选择的研究使用没有特定情绪质量的标准化负性图片,测试了情绪强度和年龄的影响,但我们在 52 名年轻参与者和 41 名年长参与者中,使用与个人相关的自传体记忆来引发离散的愤怒情绪。此外,我们将习惯性的情绪重评纳入情绪调节选择的预测因素。我们的主要假设是,与年轻参与者相比,年长参与者更喜欢资源需求较少的情绪调节策略(即分心),而不是资源需求较高的策略(即情绪重评),尤其是当年长参与者的习惯性情绪重评较低,且需要调节的愤怒情绪强度较高时。令人惊讶的是,我们的研究结果表明,只有年长参与者的情绪调节选择取决于自传体记忆的情绪强度和习惯性情绪重评。只有习惯性情绪重评较高的年长参与者,在低愤怒强度的情况下才更喜欢情绪重评自己的愤怒情绪,而在高愤怒记忆中,则会转而选择资源需求较低的分心策略,这表明他们具有情绪调节灵活性。这项研究通过在自然情境中测试情绪调节选择,并考虑调节习惯,扩展了先前的研究。虽然我们仅在习惯性情绪重评较高的年长参与者的愤怒记忆中,复制了先前关于情绪调节灵活性与情绪强度关系的发现,但我们的研究结果表明,在年龄比较研究中,情绪重评习惯与情绪调节选择的相关性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验