Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Psychol Aging. 2018 Mar;33(2):338-349. doi: 10.1037/pag0000227.
In previous research, older adults show greater emotional benefits from distracting themselves than from reappraising an event when strategically regulating emotion. Older adults also demonstrate an attentional preference to avoid, while younger adults show a bias toward approaching negative stimuli. This suggests a possible age-related differentiation of cognitive effort across approach and avoidance of negative stimuli during emotion regulation. In this study, we tracked cognitive effort via pupil dilation during the use of distraction (avoidance) and reappraisal (approach) strategies across age. Forty-eight younger adults (M = 20.94, SD = 1.78; 19 men) and 48 older adults (M = 68.82, SD = 5.40; 15 men) viewed a slideshow of negative images and were instructed to distract, reappraise, or passively view each image. Older adults showed greater pupil dilation during reappraisal than distraction, but younger adults displayed no difference between conditions-an effect that survived when controlling for gaze patterns. Gaze findings revealed that older adults looked less within images during active emotion regulation compared with passive viewing (no difference between distraction and reappraisal), and younger adults showed no difference across strategies. Younger adults gazed less within the most emotional image areas during distraction, but this did not significantly contribute to pupil response. Our findings support that distraction is less cognitively effortful than reinterpreting negative information in later life. These findings could be explained by older adults' motivational bias to disengage from negative information because of the age-related positivity effect, or compensation for decreased working memory resources across the life span. (PsycINFO Database Record
在之前的研究中,与重新评估事件相比,老年人通过分散注意力来调节情绪时会获得更大的情绪益处。老年人也表现出回避的注意力偏好,而年轻人则表现出接近负面刺激的偏见。这表明在情绪调节过程中,对接近和回避负面刺激的认知努力可能会因年龄而异。在这项研究中,我们通过瞳孔扩张来跟踪认知努力,在使用分心(回避)和重新评估(接近)策略时跨越年龄。48 名年轻成年人(M = 20.94,SD = 1.78;19 名男性)和 48 名老年成年人(M = 68.82,SD = 5.40;15 名男性)观看了一系列负面图像,并被指示分散注意力、重新评估或被动观看每张图像。与分心相比,老年人在重新评估时瞳孔扩张更大,但年轻人在两种情况下没有差异——当控制注视模式时,这种影响仍然存在。注视结果表明,与被动观看相比,老年人在积极的情绪调节过程中看图像内部的次数较少(与分心和重新评估没有区别),而年轻人在策略之间没有区别。在分心时,年轻人在最情绪化的图像区域内注视的次数较少,但这并没有对瞳孔反应产生显著影响。我们的研究结果支持,在晚年,分散注意力比重新解释负面信息的认知努力要小。这些发现可以用老年人因年龄相关的积极性效应而从消极信息中脱离的动机偏见来解释,或者可以用整个生命周期中工作记忆资源减少来解释。