School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
Department of Exercise Science, LaGrange College, Lagrange, Georgia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Aug 1;35(8):2102-2113. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004071.
Vann, CG, Haun, CT, Osburn, SC, Romero, MA, Roberson, PA, Mumford, PW, Mobley, CB, Holmes, HM, Fox, CD, Young, KC, and Roberts, MD. Molecular differences in skeletal muscle after 1 week of active vs. passive recovery from high-volume resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 35(8): 2102-2113, 2021-Numerous studies have evaluated how deloading after resistance training (RT) affects strength and power outcomes. However, the molecular adaptations that occur after deload periods remain understudied. Trained, college-aged men (n = 30) performed 6 weeks of whole-body RT starting at 10 sets of 10 repetitions per exercise per week and finishing at 32 sets of 10 repetitions per exercise per week. After this period, subjects performed either active (AR; n = 16) or passive recovery (PR; n = 14) for 1 week where AR completed ∼15% of the week 6 training volume and PR ceased training. Variables related to body composition and recovery examined before RT (PRE), after 6 weeks of RT (POST), and after the 1-week recovery period (DL). Vastus lateralis (VL) muscle biopsies and blood samples were collected at each timepoint, and various biochemical and histological assays were performed. Group × time interactions (p < 0.05) existed for skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain (MHC)-IIa mRNA (AR > PR at POST and DL) and 20S proteasome activity (post-hoc tests revealed no significance in groups over time). Time effects (P < 0.05) existed for total mood disturbance and serum creatine kinase and mechano growth factor mRNA (POST > PRE &D L), VL pressure to pain threshold and MHC-IIx mRNA (PRE&DL > POST), Atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 mRNA (PRE < POST < DL), MHC-I mRNA (PRE < POST & DL), myostatin mRNA (PRE & POST < DL), and mechanistic target of rapamycin (PRE > POST & DL). No interactions or time effects were observed for barbell squat velocity, various hormones, histological metrics, polyubiquitinated proteins, or phosphorylated/pan protein levels of 4E-BP1, p70S6k, and AMPK. One week of AR after a high-volume training block instigates marginal molecular differences in skeletal muscle relative to PR. From a practical standpoint, however, both paradigms elicited largely similar responses.
万恩,CG,豪恩,CT,奥斯本,SC,罗梅罗,MA,罗伯逊,PA,芒福德,PW,莫布利,CB,霍姆斯,HM,福克斯,CD,杨,KC,罗伯茨,MD。与被动恢复相比,高强度阻力训练后 1 周主动恢复对骨骼肌的分子差异。J 强能力研究 35(8):2102-2113,2021 年-许多研究评估了阻力训练(RT)后减载如何影响力量和力量结果。然而,减载后发生的分子适应仍然研究不足。受过训练的、大学年龄的男性(n=30)进行了 6 周的全身 RT,起始于每周每练习 10 组 10 次重复,结束于每周每练习 32 组 10 次重复。在这一阶段之后,受试者进行了 1 周的主动(AR;n=16)或被动恢复(PR;n=14),其中 AR 完成了大约 15%的第 6 周训练量,PR 停止了训练。在 RT 前(PRE)、6 周 RT 后(POST)和 1 周恢复期(DL),对与身体成分和恢复相关的变量进行了检查。在每个时间点采集股外侧肌(VL)活检和血液样本,并进行了各种生化和组织学检测。组×时间的相互作用(p<0.05)存在于骨骼肌肌球蛋白重链(MHC)-IIa mRNA(AR>PR 在 POST 和 DL)和 20S 蛋白酶体活性(事后检验显示各组在时间上无显著差异)。时间效应(P<0.05)存在于总心境干扰和血清肌酸激酶和机械生长因子 mRNA(POST>PRE&DL)、VL 压力到疼痛阈值和 MHC-IIx mRNA(PRE&DL>POST)、Atrogin-1 和 MuRF-1 mRNA(PRE<POST<DL)、MHC-I mRNA(PRE<POST&DL)、肌肉生长抑制素 mRNA(PRE&POST<DL)和雷帕霉素靶蛋白(PRE>POST&DL)。在杠铃深蹲速度、各种激素、组织学指标、多聚泛素化蛋白或 4E-BP1、p70S6k 和 AMPK 的磷酸化/全蛋白水平方面,没有观察到相互作用或时间效应。与 PR 相比,高强度训练块后 1 周的 AR 会引起骨骼肌的分子差异,但差异很小。然而,从实际的角度来看,这两种方案都引起了类似的反应。