Department of Emergency Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
IQ healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Emerg Med J. 2022 Feb;39(2):139-146. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210168. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
With the 'teach-back' method, patients or carers repeat back what they understand, so that professionals can confirm comprehension and correct misunderstandings. The effectiveness of teach-back has been underexamined, particularly for older patients discharged from the emergency department (ED). We aimed to determine whether teach-back would reduce ED revisits and whether it would increase patients' retention of discharge instructions, improve self-management at home and increase satisfaction with the provision of instructions.
A nonrandomised pre-post pilot evaluation in the ED of one Dutch academic hospital including patients discharged from the ED receiving standard discharge care (pre) and teach-back (post). Primary outcomes were ED-revisits within 7 days and within 8-30 days postdischarge. Secondary outcomes for a subsample of older adults were retention of instructions, self-management 72 hours after discharge and satisfaction with the provision of discharge instructions.
A total of 648 patients were included, 154 were older adults. ED revisits within 7 days and within 8-30 days were lower in the teach-back group compared with those receiving standard discharge care: adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of 0.23 (95% CI 0.05 to 1.07) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.14 to 1.33), respectively. Participants in the teach-back group had an increased likelihood of full knowledge retention on information related to their ED diagnosis and treatment (AOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.01 to 4.75; p=0.048), medication (AOR 14.89; 95% CI 4.12 to 53.85; p>0.001) and follow-up appointments (AOR 3.86; 95% CI 1.33 to 10.19; p=0.012). Use of teach-back was not significantly associated with improved self-management and higher satisfaction with discharge instructions. Discharge conversations were generally shorter for participants receiving teach-back.
Discharging patients from the ED with a relatively simple and feasible teach-back method can contribute to safer and better transitional care from the ED to home.
通过“回述”方法,患者或照顾者重复他们所理解的内容,以便专业人员可以确认理解并纠正误解。“回述”的有效性尚未得到充分研究,特别是对于从急诊科(ED)出院的老年患者。我们旨在确定“回述”是否会减少 ED 复诊次数,以及是否会增加患者对出院指导的保留、改善家庭自我管理并提高对指导提供的满意度。
在荷兰一家学术医院的 ED 中进行了一项非随机前后试点评估,包括从 ED 出院的患者接受标准出院护理(前)和“回述”(后)。主要结局为 7 天内和出院后 8-30 天内的 ED 复诊。对于老年患者的亚组,次要结局为出院指导的保留、出院后 72 小时的自我管理和对出院指导提供的满意度。
共纳入 648 名患者,其中 154 名为老年人。与接受标准出院护理的患者相比,接受“回述”的患者在 7 天内和 8-30 天内的 ED 复诊率较低:调整后的优势比(AOR)分别为 0.23(95%CI 0.05 至 1.07)和 0.42(95%CI 0.14 至 1.33)。接受“回述”的患者对与 ED 诊断和治疗相关的信息的知识保留更完整的可能性更高(AOR 2.19;95%CI 1.01 至 4.75;p=0.048)、药物(AOR 14.89;95%CI 4.12 至 53.85;p>0.001)和随访预约(AOR 3.86;95%CI 1.33 至 10.19;p=0.012)。使用“回述”与改善自我管理和提高对出院指导的满意度之间没有显著关联。接受“回述”的患者的出院谈话通常更短。
用一种相对简单且可行的“回述”方法从 ED 出院的患者可以为从 ED 到家庭的更安全、更好的过渡护理做出贡献。