Mammola Stefano, Lunghi Enrico, Bilandžija Helena, Cardoso Pedro, Grimm Volker, Schmidt Susanne I, Hesselberg Thomas, Martínez Alejandro
Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe) Finnish Museum of Natural History (LUOMUS) University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
Dark-MEG: Molecular Ecology Group Water Research Institute (IRSA) National Research Council (CNR) Verbania Italy.
Ecol Evol. 2021 May 1;11(11):5911-5926. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7556. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Caves and other subterranean habitats fulfill the requirements of experimental model systems to address general questions in ecology and evolution. Yet, the harsh working conditions of these environments and the uniqueness of the subterranean organisms have challenged most attempts to pursuit standardized research.Two main obstacles have synergistically hampered previous attempts. First, there is a related to the objective difficulties of exploring subterranean habitats and our inability to access the network of fissures that represents the elective habitat for the so-called "cave species." Second, there is a illustrated by the rarity of most subterranean species and their low physiological tolerance, often limiting sample size and complicating laboratory experiments.We explore the advantages and disadvantages of four general experimental setups (, , , and ) in the light of habitat and biological impediments. We also discuss the potential of indirect approaches to research. Furthermore, using bibliometric data, we provide a quantitative overview of the model organisms that scientists have exploited in the study of subterranean life.Our over-arching goal is to promote caves as model systems where one can perform standardized scientific research. This is important not only to achieve an in-depth understanding of the functioning of subterranean ecosystems but also to fully exploit their long-discussed potential in addressing general scientific questions with implications beyond the boundaries of this discipline.
洞穴和其他地下栖息地满足了实验模型系统的要求,以解决生态学和进化方面的一般性问题。然而,这些环境恶劣的工作条件以及地下生物的独特性,对大多数追求标准化研究的尝试构成了挑战。两个主要障碍协同阻碍了先前的尝试。第一,存在一个与探索地下栖息地的客观困难以及我们无法进入代表所谓“洞穴物种”选择性栖息地的裂隙网络相关的问题。第二,存在一个由大多数地下物种的稀有性及其低生理耐受性所说明的问题,这常常限制了样本量并使实验室实验复杂化。鉴于栖息地和生物学障碍,我们探讨了四种一般实验设置(,,,和)的优缺点。我们还讨论了间接研究方法的潜力。此外,利用文献计量数据,我们对科学家在地下生命研究中所利用的模式生物进行了定量概述。我们的总体目标是推动将洞穴作为可以进行标准化科学研究的模型系统。这不仅对于深入了解地下生态系统的功能很重要,而且对于充分利用它们长期以来被讨论的在解决具有超出该学科范围影响的一般科学问题方面的潜力也很重要。