Suppr超能文献

非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者院内死亡的简易预测评分

A simple prediction score for in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

作者信息

Matsuhashi Tamotsu, Hatta Waku, Hikichi Takuto, Fukuda Sho, Mikami Tatsuya, Tatsuta Tetsuya, Nakamura Jun, Abe Yasuhiko, Onozato Yusuke, Ogata Yohei, Masamune Atsushi, Ohyauchi Motoki, Ito Hirotaka, Hanabata Norihiro, Araki Yasumitsu, Yanagita Takumi, Imamura Hidemichi, Tsuji Tsuyotoshi, Sugawara Kae, Horikawa Yohei, Ohara Shuichi, Kondo Yutaka, Dohmen Takahiro, Kakuta Yoichi, Nakamura Tomohiro, Iijima Katsunori

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.

Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug;56(8):758-768. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01797-w. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No prediction scores for the mortality of both inpatients and outpatients who developed nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) without endoscopic findings have been established. We aimed to derive and validate a novel prediction score for in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a three-stage, multicenter retrospective study. In the derivation stage, patients with nonvariceal UGIB at six institutions were enrolled to derive the prediction score by logistic regression analysis. External validation of the score was performed to analyze discrimination by patients at six other institutions. Then the performance of this score was compared with that of four existing scores.

RESULTS

We enrolled 1380 and 825 patients in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. A prediction score (CHAMPS-R Score) comprising seven variables (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2, in-hospital onset, albumin < 2.5 g/dL, altered mental status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2, steroids, and rebleeding) with equal-weight scores was established, with high discriminative ability in both derivation and validation cohorts (c statistic, 0.91 and 0.80, respectively). When rebeeding was excluded from the score (an onset model; CHAMPS Score), this score also achieved high discriminative ability (c statistic, 0.90 and 0.81, respectively). The prediction scores had significantly higher discriminative ability than the Glasgow Blatchford Score, AIMS65, ABC Score, and clinical Rockall Score in both cohorts (all, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We derived and externally validated prediction scores for in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal UGIB. The CHAMPS Score might be optimal for managing such patients. Its mobile application is freely available ( https://apps.apple.com/app/id1565716902 for iOS and https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=hatta.CHAMPS for Android).

摘要

背景

对于发生非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(UGIB)且无内镜检查发现的住院患者和门诊患者的死亡率,尚未建立预测评分系统。我们旨在推导并验证一种用于预测住院死亡率的新型评分系统。

方法

我们进行了一项三阶段的多中心回顾性研究。在推导阶段,纳入了六个机构中患有非静脉曲张性UGIB的患者,通过逻辑回归分析推导预测评分。对该评分进行外部验证,分析另外六个机构患者的辨别能力。然后将该评分的性能与四个现有评分的性能进行比较。

结果

我们在推导队列和验证队列中分别纳入了1380例和825例患者。建立了一个包含七个变量(Charlson合并症指数≥2、院内发病、白蛋白<2.5 g/dL、精神状态改变、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态≥2、使用类固醇以及再出血)且权重相等的预测评分(CHAMPS-R评分),在推导队列和验证队列中均具有较高的辨别能力(c统计量分别为0.91和0.80)。当从评分中排除再出血因素(一种发病模型;CHAMPS评分)时,该评分也具有较高的辨别能力(c统计量分别为0.90和0.81)。在两个队列中,该预测评分的辨别能力均显著高于格拉斯哥布拉奇福德评分、AIMS65评分、ABC评分和临床Rockall评分(均为p<0.05)。

结论

我们推导并外部验证了非静脉曲张性UGIB患者住院死亡率的预测评分。CHAMPS评分可能是管理此类患者的最佳选择。其移动应用程序可免费获取(iOS版:https://apps.apple.com/app/id1565716902;安卓版:https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=hatta.CHAMPS)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验