• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中的自然流产。美国预防服务工作组(ASPN)的一份报告。

Spontaneous abortion in primary care. A report from ASPN.

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Pract. 1988 Jan-Mar;1(1):15-23.

PMID:3414385
Abstract

The Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN) conducted an observational study of usual primary care of spontaneous abortion (SAB). Forty-nine practices in 18 states and four Canadian provinces reported and audited 171 SABs. Contrary to recommendations in some texts, 40 percent were managed completely in the office and/or at home, and only 51 percent had a dilation and curettage (D&C). SABs occurring later in pregnancy were more likely to be managed in the emergency room/hospital, receive consultation, and have a D&C. Patients managed with D&C had a greater frequency of excessive blood loss at diagnosis, but otherwise they did not differ in terms of complications at diagnosis or follow-up from those who did not. Adverse psychological consequences were subjectively observed by ASPN clinicians in 24 percent of women, exceeding any other category of complications. Management of all SABs in a hospital with D&C, instead of the management observed in this study, could add $145,000,000 per year to health care expenditures in the United States.

摘要

门诊哨点实践网络(ASPN)对自然流产(SAB)的常规初级护理进行了一项观察性研究。来自18个州和加拿大4个省的49家医疗机构报告并审核了171例自然流产病例。与一些文献中的建议相反,40%的病例完全在诊所和/或家中处理,只有51%的病例进行了刮宫术(D&C)。妊娠后期发生的自然流产更有可能在急诊室/医院处理、接受会诊并进行刮宫术。接受刮宫术处理的患者在诊断时失血过多的频率更高,但在诊断或随访时的并发症方面与未接受刮宫术的患者并无差异。ASPN临床医生主观观察到24%的女性有不良心理后果,这一比例超过了任何其他并发症类别。在美国,若将所有自然流产病例都在医院进行刮宫术处理,而非采用本研究中观察到的处理方式,每年的医疗保健支出将增加1.45亿美元。

相似文献

1
Spontaneous abortion in primary care. A report from ASPN.基层医疗中的自然流产。美国预防服务工作组(ASPN)的一份报告。
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1988 Jan-Mar;1(1):15-23.
2
Verification of data reported by practices for a study of spontaneous abortion.对用于自然流产研究的医疗机构所报告数据的核查。
Fam Med. 1988 May-Jun;20(3):189-91.
3
Management of spontaneous abortion in family practices and hospitals.家庭诊所和医院中自然流产的管理。
Fam Med. 1998 Apr;30(4):293-6.
4
Pelvic inflammatory disease in primary care.基层医疗中的盆腔炎性疾病
Fam Med. 1988 May-Jun;20(3):192-6.
5
Pregnancy loss managed by cervical dilatation and curettage increases the risk of spontaneous preterm birth.宫颈扩张和刮宫术处理的妊娠丢失增加自发性早产的风险。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Dec;28(12):3197-206. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det332. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
6
Carpal tunnel syndrome in primary care: a report from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network.基层医疗中的腕管综合征:来自门诊哨兵实践网络(ASPN)的报告
J Fam Pract. 1994 Apr;38(4):337-44.
7
Dilatation and evacuation procedures and second-trimester abortions. The role of physician skill and hospital setting.扩张与刮宫术及孕中期堕胎。医生技能与医院环境的作用。
JAMA. 1982 Aug 6;248(5):559-63.
8
[Ambulatory abortion, its advantages and economic effectiveness].[门诊流产及其优势与经济效益]
Akush Ginekol (Mosk). 1992 Feb(2):34-7.
9
Expectant, medical or surgical treatment for spontaneous abortion in first trimester of pregnancy: a cost analysis.妊娠早期自然流产的期待治疗、药物治疗或手术治疗:成本分析
Hum Reprod. 2005 Oct;20(10):2873-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei163. Epub 2005 Jun 24.
10
The development and management of a primary care research network, 1978-87.初级保健研究网络的发展与管理,1978 - 1987年
Fam Med. 1988 May-Jun;20(3):177-81.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application.使用纸质记录、电子健康记录提示和智能手机应用程序的临床数据收集方法的初步比较
J Am Board Fam Med. 2025 May 12;38(1):46-55. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240199R1.
2
Interference with SRF expression in skeletal muscles reduces peripheral nerve regeneration in mice.干扰骨骼肌肉中 SRF 的表达可减少小鼠周围神经的再生。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 24;10(1):5281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62231-4.
3
Practice-Based Research Networks: Strategic Opportunities to Advance Implementation Research for Health Equity.
基于实践的研究网络:推进卫生公平性实施研究的战略机遇。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Feb 21;29(Suppl 1):113-118. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S1.113. eCollection 2019.
4
Antiepileptic drug exposure in pregnancy and pregnancy outcome from national drug usage data.孕期抗癫痫药物暴露与国家药物使用数据的妊娠结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Apr 6;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1728-y.
5
Characteristics and lessons learned from practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in the United States.美国基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)的特点及实践经验
J Healthc Leadersh. 2012 Sep;4:107-116. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S16441.
6
The DARTNet Institute: Seeking a Sustainable Support Mechanism for Electronic Data Enabled Research Networks.DARTNet 研究所:为电子数据支持的研究网络寻求可持续的支持机制。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Sep 2;2(2):1063. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1063. eCollection 2014.
7
Update from ASPN.来自美国胰腺病学会(ASPN)的最新消息。
Can Fam Physician. 1989 Apr;35:843-6.
8
Card studies for observational research in practice.临床实践中的观察性研究的病例研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;9(1):63-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1199.
9
Voices from left of the dial: reflections of practice-based researchers.来自刻度盘左侧的声音:实践型研究人员的反思。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;23(4):442-51. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.04.090189.
10
Networks for new knowledge in family medicine.家庭医学新知识网络。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):521-2. doi: 10.1370/afm.225.