Mino Eriselda, Geidl Wolfgang, Naber Inga, Weissenfels Anja, Klamroth Sarah, Gelius Peter, Abu-Omar Karim, Pfeifer Klaus
Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 18;11(6):e049549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049549.
In its attempt to establish effective physical activity promotion methods, research on physical activity referral schemes (PARS) is attracting significant attention. Sometimes known as physical activity on prescription schemes, PARS involve a well-defined procedure whereby a primary healthcare professional introduces a participant to the topic of physical activity and employs prescription or referral forms to connect the participant to physical activity opportunities, such as local fitness offers. The planned systematic review will focus on these referral routes and scheme components and how they are integrated into various PARS models worldwide. We seek to identify the evidence-based core components that play the most important roles in the effectiveness of PARS.
The development and reporting of the protocol follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. We plan to conduct a systematic main literature search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, HTA, SpringerLink and other databases. We will include studies that report outcomes on physical activity, PARS uptake and adherence rates or descriptive information about PARS models. We intend for all review stages, citation screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment to be conducted by at least two independent reviewers. As a broad spectrum of study designs, including randomised and non-randomised studies of interventions and mixed methods, will be eligible, we will use three separate tools to assess the risk of bias in individual studies. The data will be primarily synthesised narratively, following Intervention Component Analysis. If the data allow, we will perform a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression to investigate the impact of specific PARS components on effect sizes.
This systematic review does not require formal ethics approval. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and international conferences to reach the scientific community.
CRD42021233229.
在试图建立有效的身体活动促进方法的过程中,对身体活动转诊计划(PARS)的研究正引起广泛关注。PARS有时也被称为基于处方的身体活动计划,它包含一个明确的程序,即初级医疗保健专业人员向参与者介绍身体活动的话题,并使用处方或转诊表格将参与者与身体活动机会联系起来,比如当地的健身服务。本计划中的系统评价将聚焦于这些转诊途径和计划组成部分,以及它们如何在全球范围内被整合到各种PARS模式中。我们旨在确定在PARS有效性方面发挥最重要作用的循证核心组成部分。
本方案的制定和报告遵循系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目指南。我们计划在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL、HTA、SpringerLink和其他数据库上进行系统的主要文献检索。我们将纳入报告身体活动结果、PARS参与率和依从率或关于PARS模式的描述性信息的研究。我们打算让至少两名独立的评审员进行所有的评审阶段,包括文献筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。由于包括干预措施的随机和非随机研究以及混合方法在内的广泛研究设计都将符合要求,我们将使用三种不同的工具来评估个别研究中的偏倚风险。数据将主要按照干预成分分析进行叙述性综合。如果数据允许,我们将进行随机效应Meta分析和Meta回归,以研究特定PARS成分对效应大小的影响。
本系统评价无需正式的伦理批准。研究结果将提交给同行评审期刊和国际会议,以传达给科学界。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42021233229。