Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Gebbertstraße 123b, Erlangen, 91058, Germany.
School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh, EH11 4DN, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Aug 2;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01623-5.
Physical activity referral schemes (PARS) are composed of various components, such as a written prescription or a person-centered approach. The role of these components in their effectiveness is yet to be understood. Therefore, we aimed to explore the relationships between PARS components and physical activity, scheme uptake, and adherence rate; and to estimate the effect of PARS.
We searched Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, HTA, Wiley Online Library, SAGE Journals, Taylor & Francis, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and CORE. Eligible studies were published between 1990 and November 2023 in English or German, investigated PARS with participants aged ≥ 16 years, and reported physical activity, scheme uptake, or scheme adherence. Separate random-effects meta-analysis by comparison group were conducted for physical activity. Scheme uptake and adherence rates were pooled using proportional meta-analysis. The components were analyzed via univariate meta-regression. We rated the risk of bias using RoB2 and ROBINS-I, and the certainty of evidence using GRADE.
Fifty-two studies were included. PARS were more effective in increasing physical activity than usual care (k = 11, n = 5046, Hedges' g = 0.18, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.25; high certainty of evidence). When PARS were compared with physical activity advice or enhanced scheme versions, the pooled Hedges' g values for physical activity were -0.06 (k = 5, n = 1082, 95%CI -0.21 to 0.10; low certainty of evidence), and 0.07 (k = 9, n = 2647, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.18; low certainty of evidence) respectively. Scheme uptake was 87% (95%CI 77% to 94%, k = 14, n = 5000) across experimental studies and 68% (95%CI 51% to 83%, k = 14, n = 25,048) across non-experimental studies. Pooled scheme adherence was 68% (95%CI 55% to 80%, k = 16, n = 3939) and 53% (95%CI 42% to 63%, k = 18, n = 14,605). The meta-regression did not detect any significant relationships between components and physical activity or scheme uptake. A person-centered approach, screening, and brief advice were positively associated with scheme adherence, while physical activity sessions were negatively associated.
PARS are more effective in increasing physical activity than usual care only. We did not identify any components as significant predictors of physical activity and scheme uptake. Four components predicted scheme adherence, indicating that the component-effectiveness relationship warrants further research.
身体活动推荐计划(PARS)由多种组成部分构成,如书面处方或以人为中心的方法。这些组成部分在其有效性中的作用尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在探讨 PARS 组成部分与身体活动、计划参与率和计划依从率之间的关系,并估计 PARS 的效果。
我们在 Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、ScienceDirect、SpringerLink、HTA、Wiley Online Library、SAGE 期刊、Taylor & Francis、Google Scholar、OpenGrey 和 CORE 中进行了搜索。合格的研究在 1990 年至 2023 年 11 月期间发表,以年龄≥16 岁的参与者为对象,调查了包含 PARS 的研究,并报告了身体活动、计划参与率或计划依从率。对对照组进行了单独的随机效应荟萃分析,对方案参与率和依从率进行了比例荟萃分析。使用单变量荟萃回归分析了组件。我们使用 RoB2 和 ROBINS-I 评估偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 评估证据确定性。
共纳入 52 项研究。与常规护理相比,PARS 更能有效增加身体活动(k=11,n=5046,Hedges' g=0.18,95%CI 0.12-0.25;证据确定性高)。当将 PARS 与身体活动建议或增强版本的计划进行比较时,身体活动的荟萃 Hedges' g 值分别为-0.06(k=5,n=1082,95%CI-0.21-0.10;证据确定性低)和 0.07(k=9,n=2647,95%CI-0.03-0.18;证据确定性低)。实验研究中方案参与率为 87%(95%CI 77%-94%,k=14,n=5000),非实验研究中方案参与率为 68%(95%CI 51%-83%,k=14,n=25048)。方案依从率的汇总值为 68%(95%CI 55%-80%,k=16,n=3939)和 53%(95%CI 42%-63%,k=18,n=14605)。元回归未发现组成部分与身体活动或方案参与率之间的任何显著关系。以人为中心的方法、筛查和简短建议与方案依从性呈正相关,而身体活动课程与方案依从性呈负相关。
与常规护理相比,PARS 仅在增加身体活动方面更有效。我们没有发现任何组件是身体活动和方案参与率的显著预测因素。四个组件预测了方案依从性,表明组件-效果关系需要进一步研究。