Suppr超能文献

基线特征能否预测慢性非特异性颈痛患者进行颈部特定运动后疼痛和残疾的减轻?:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Can baseline features predict a reduction in pain and disability following neck-specific exercise in people with chronic non-specific neck pain?: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

机构信息

Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 10;13(7):e074494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074494.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Neck-specific exercises (NSEs) are commonly used for the treatment of chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP). However, it remains unclear whether baseline features can predict the response to neck-specific exercise (NSE) in people with CNSNP. This systematic review aims to assess whether baseline features such as age, gender, muscle activity, fatigability, endurance and fear of movement can predict pain and disability reduction following a NSE intervention.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review and meta-analysis will be reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Protocols guidelines checklist. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases; key journals; and grey literature will be searched up until June 2023, including medical subject heading terms and keywords combinations. Included studies will investigate an association between the baseline features and pain and disability outcomes following NSE in people with CNSNP. Two independent reviewers will oversee the searching, screening, data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Risk-Of-Bias tool for randomised trials 2 (ROB 2). The quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE). Using standardised forms, details regarding study characteristics, baseline features (predictive factors), intervention, primary outcome and effect size (OR and 95% CI of each predictive factor and p value) will be extracted from included studies. Meta-analyses will be considered, if the studies are sufficiently homogeneous and if three or more studies investigate the same or comparable factors that predict the same response (pain intensity or disability). In the event that less than three studies investigated the same factors, a narrative synthesis will be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval will not be required as this review will be based on published studies. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023408332.

摘要

简介

颈部特定运动(NSE)常用于治疗慢性非特异性颈部疼痛(CNSNP)。然而,目前尚不清楚基线特征是否可以预测 CNSNP 患者对颈部特定运动(NSE)的反应。本系统评价旨在评估基线特征(如年龄、性别、肌肉活动、疲劳性、耐力和运动恐惧)是否可以预测 NSE 干预后疼痛和残疾的减轻。

方法和分析

本系统评价和荟萃分析将按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)方案指南检查表进行报告。Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus、MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL 数据库、主要期刊和灰色文献将从 2023 年 6 月起进行搜索,包括医学主题词和关键词组合。纳入的研究将调查 CNSNP 患者 NSE 后基线特征与疼痛和残疾结局之间的关联。两名独立的审查员将负责监督搜索、筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。使用非随机干预研究的风险偏倚(ROBINS-I)和随机试验的风险偏倚工具 2(ROB 2)评估偏倚风险。使用 GRADE(评估、制定和评估推荐的分级)评估证据质量。使用标准化表格,从纳入的研究中提取研究特征、基线特征(预测因素)、干预、主要结局和效应大小(每个预测因素的 OR 和 95%CI 以及 p 值)的详细信息。如果研究足够同质,并且如果三项或更多研究调查了预测相同反应(疼痛强度或残疾)的相同或可比因素,则将考虑进行荟萃分析。如果少于三项研究调查了相同的因素,则将进行叙述性综合。

伦理和传播

由于本综述将基于已发表的研究,因此不需要伦理批准。本研究的结果将提交给同行评议的期刊,并在会议上展示。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023408332。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Exploring pain interference with motor skill learning in humans: a protocol for a systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 16;11(7):e045841. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045841.
4
Kinesiophobia and its correlations with pain, proprioception, and functional performance among individuals with chronic neck pain.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 8;16(7):e0254262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254262. eCollection 2021.
6
Does pain influence force steadiness? A protocol for a systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):e042525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042525.
7
Predictors for Positive Response to Home Kinematic Training in Chronic Neck Pain.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Oct;43(8):779-790. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic neck pain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 12;12(12):CD011927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011927.pub2.
10
Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain Have Lower Neck Strength Than Healthy Controls: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Oct;42(8):608-622. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Nov 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验