Division of Cancer, Imperial Centre for Translational and Experimental Medicine, London, UK.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Aug;188(3):631-640. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06240-5. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
Equivalent efficacy was demonstrated for the biosimilar CT-P6 and trastuzumab following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer. Following adjuvant treatment, efficacy and safety were comparable between treatments. We report updated safety and efficacy data after up to 3 years' follow-up.
Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CT-P6/trastuzumab, patients underwent surgery and continued receiving adjuvant CT-P6/trastuzumab. The primary endpoint (previously reported) was pathological complete response. Time-to-event analyses (disease-free survival [DFS], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]), study drug-related and cardiac adverse events, and immunogenicity were assessed during post-treatment follow-up.
Most patients entered the follow-up period (CT-P6: 259 [95.6%]; trastuzumab: 269 [96.8%]). After a median follow-up of 38.7 (CT-P6) and 39.6 (trastuzumab) months, medians were not reached for time-to-event parameters; estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 3-year survival rates were similar between groups. Estimated HRs (95% confidence intervals) for CT-P6 versus trastuzumab were 1.23 (0.78-1.93) for DFS, 1.31 (0.86-2.01) for PFS, and 1.10 (0.57-2.13) for OS (intention-to-treat population). Safety findings were comparable between groups for the overall study and follow-up period, including study drug-related cardiac disorders (CT-P6: 22 [8.1%] patients; trastuzumab: 24 [8.6%] patients [overall]) and decreases in left ventricular ejection fraction. Immunogenicity was similar between groups.
The similarity of the time-to-event analyses between CT-P6 and trastuzumab supports the equivalence in terms of efficacy established for the primary endpoint. CT-P6 was well tolerated, with comparable safety and immunogenicity to trastuzumab. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02162667 (registered June 13, 2014).
曲妥珠单抗生物类似药 CT-P6 与曲妥珠单抗在人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阳性早期乳腺癌患者新辅助治疗后显示出等效疗效。辅助治疗后,两种治疗方法的疗效和安全性相当。我们报告了最长 3 年随访后的最新安全性和疗效数据。
患者接受 CT-P6/曲妥珠单抗新辅助化疗后进行手术,并继续接受辅助 CT-P6/曲妥珠单抗治疗。主要终点(先前报告)是病理完全缓解。在治疗后随访期间评估了时间事件分析(无病生存[DFS]、无进展生存[PFS]和总生存[OS])、研究药物相关和心脏不良事件以及免疫原性。
大多数患者进入随访期(CT-P6:259[95.6%];曲妥珠单抗:269[96.8%])。在 CT-P6 中位数为 38.7 个月和曲妥珠单抗中位数为 39.6 个月的中位随访后,时间事件参数未达到中位数;两组的估计风险比(HR)和 3 年生存率相似。CT-P6 与曲妥珠单抗相比的估计 HR(95%置信区间)为 DFS 为 1.23(0.78-1.93),PFS 为 1.31(0.86-2.01),OS 为 1.10(0.57-2.13)(意向治疗人群)。在整个研究和随访期间,两组的安全性发现相似,包括与研究药物相关的心脏疾病(CT-P6:22[8.1%]例患者;曲妥珠单抗:24[8.6%]例患者[总])和左心室射血分数降低。两组的免疫原性相似。
CT-P6 与曲妥珠单抗的时间事件分析相似支持主要终点等效性的建立。CT-P6 具有良好的耐受性,与曲妥珠单抗的安全性和免疫原性相当。ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02162667(2014 年 6 月 13 日注册)。