Suppr超能文献

社交媒体干预措施对健康差异人群的健康行为改变是否有效?:一项荟萃分析综述。

Are Social Media Interventions for Health Behavior Change Efficacious among Populations with Health Disparities?: A Meta-Analytic Review.

机构信息

Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina.

Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2023 Jan;38(1):133-140. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1937830. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

Abstract

While prior reviews have identified positive effects of social media interventions for health behavior change generally, it is unclear whether these effects persist in traditionally underrepresented populations that are at disproportionate risk of disease. The current meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of social media interventions for health behavior change among populations with health disparities. We analyzed 17 studies with a cumulative = 3,561. Social media interventions had a significant moderate-sized effect on behavior change among populations with health disparities ( = 0.303, 95% CI: 0.156, 0.460, < .001), and there was significant heterogeneity across the studies ( = 64.48, < .001, 75.19). Exploratory moderator analyses revealed larger effects in studies with smaller sample size ( < .05) and those using additional intervention channels, including e-mail and telephone ( < .05). Findings suggest that social media interventions may be a promising intervention tool for stimulating behavior change among populations with health disparities, but several gaps remain in the literature. Public health professionals and other health communicators should further explore ways to increase both the reach and impact of social media interventions among populations with health disparities.

摘要

虽然之前的综述已经确定了社交媒体干预措施对健康行为改变的积极影响,但尚不清楚这些影响是否会持续存在于那些疾病风险不成比例的代表性不足的人群中。本荟萃分析检查了社交媒体干预措施对健康差异人群健康行为改变的有效性。我们分析了 17 项研究,累计有 = 3561 人。社交媒体干预措施对健康差异人群的行为改变有显著的中等影响( = 0.303,95%置信区间:0.156,0.460, < 0.001),且研究之间存在显著的异质性( = 64.48, < 0.001,75.19)。探索性调节因素分析显示,样本量较小的研究( < 0.05)和使用额外干预渠道(包括电子邮件和电话)的研究中,效果更大( < 0.05)。研究结果表明,社交媒体干预措施可能是一种有前途的干预工具,可以促进健康差异人群的行为改变,但文献中仍存在一些空白。公共卫生专业人员和其他健康传播者应进一步探索增加健康差异人群社交媒体干预措施的覆盖面和影响力的方法。

相似文献

1
Are Social Media Interventions for Health Behavior Change Efficacious among Populations with Health Disparities?: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Health Commun. 2023 Jan;38(1):133-140. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1937830. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
7
9
Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD009905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009905.pub2.
10
Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 23;2013(7):CD009453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009453.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
4
Can Mobile Health Applications, Social Media, and Telemedicine Assist with Obesity Treatment?
Curr Obes Rep. 2025 Jun 18;14(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s13679-025-00647-7.
8
Global mental health solidarity: strategies and solutions.
Discov Ment Health. 2024 Sep 24;4(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00087-0.
10
Applying a Social Determinants of Health Framework to Guide Digital Innovations That Reduce Disparities in Chronic Disease.
Psychosom Med. 2023 Sep 1;85(7):659-669. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001176. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验