[Electroconvulsive therapy during the perinatal period: Representations of mental health professionals].

INTRODUCTION

Psychiatric disorders are common in peripartum and are associated with adverse outcomes for mother and fetus. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most effective and safe options to treat severe mental illness, including during the perinatal period. Nevertheless, it remains underutilized during this period, possibly due to negative representations. Research has been carried out on the representations and attitudes of caregivers towards ECT, but the specificities of these attitudes during peripartum have not been explored.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the attitudes towards ECT during the peripartum among psychiatrists, nurses, social workers and psychologists. The primary objective was to compare the score of favorability for ECT during peripartum according to the profession. The secondary objective was to highlight other factors involved in the favorability for ECT in peripartum.

METHODS

We investigated mental health professionals' attitudes sending by e-mail an anonymous questionnaire in five hospitals in France. The questionnaire was composed of demographic details, one scale about the attitudes towards ECT (the Questionnaire on Attitudes and Knowledge of ECT (QuAKE)) used in several studies; in this questionnaire, a specific part for perinatal period has been added for our study, both using a Likert scale. The completion time for this online questionnaire was approximately 5 to 7minutes. A score of favorability for ECT in general and in peripartum was established for each participant. These scores represented the percentage of positive responses to favorable items and of negative responses to unfavorable items towards ECT. Comparison of the QuAKE answers with a sample of English caregivers in 2001 has been determined with χ tests. A Bonferroni correction was applied due to the large number of tests performed. Factors involved in the favorability for ECT have been studied with Pearson correlation, Kruskall-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty one professionals (80 psychiatrists, 78 nurses, 19 social workers and 44 psychologists) were included in the study. Their answers to the QuAKE questionnaire were comparable or more favorable to ECT than the English sample answered in 2001. The perinatal part of questionnaire had a good internal consistency (Cronbach coefficient: 0,91). Participants were less favorable to ECT in perinatal period (favorability score: 44.2) than in general (63.6). They more often responded « uncertain » to the perinatal questionnaire (44,9 % against 18.4 % for the ECT in general; W=19931,5; P<0,001). The favorability for ECT in general and during peripartum were statistically associated with profession (psychiatrists were more favorable), specific training and experience in ECT. Gender, perinatal specialization, age, and the number of years in professional service were not associated with favorability for ECT in general and during peripartum in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have found that profession, training and experience in ECT are linked to the attitudes towards ECT, including in the perinatal period. It is necessary to inform professionals about the possibility of prescribing ECT in the perinatal period by training them in the specificities of pregnancy.