Suppr超能文献

采用低频脉冲电刺激联合早期全身功能锻炼的优质护理模式对臂丛神经损伤患者患肢功能的影响

The effect of a high-quality nursing model employing low-frequency pulse electrical stimulation combined with early systemic functional exercises on the function of the affected limb in brachial plexus injury patients.

作者信息

Huang Xiaoyu, Jiang Zongyuan, Sun Haoran, Xie Bangzhu, Lu Fang, Huang Wenlong, Wang Ting, Xiong Haiyan

机构信息

Department of Hand Surgery, People's Hospital of Longhua District Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.

Department of Nursing, People's Hospital of Longhua District Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2021 May 15;13(5):4939-4948. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of a high-quality nursing model employing low-frequency pulse electrical stimulation combined with early systemic functional exercises on the function of the affected limb in brachial plexus injury patients.

METHODS

A total of 98 brachial plexus injury patients admitted to our hospital were recruited as the research cohort. All the patients were treated with surgery to repair, release, and transfer or transplant nerves according to each patient's condition. After the operations, the patients were randomly divided into one of two groups: the control group (n=49) or the research group (n=49). The control group did early systemic functional exercises, while the research group was administered low frequency pulse electrical stimulation in addition to doing the early systemic functional exercises. The clinical efficacy, the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores before and after the treatment, the brachial plexus function scores, the nerve conduction velocities and amplitudes, the SF-36 questionnaires, the incidences of complications, and the nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After the treatment, the overall response rate to the treatment in the research group was significantly higher than it was in the control group (95.92% vs 81.63%, P<0.05). The VAS scores in both groups were decreased, and the scores in the research group were lower than the scores in the control group (P<0.05). The upper limb, lower limb, and the whole brachial plexus scores were increased in both groups, and the scores in the research group were higher than the scores in the control group (P<0.05). The motor conduction velocities, the sensory conduction velocities, and the amplitudes of the ulnar and median nerves in the two groups were increased, and the research group had higher levels than the control group (P<0.05). The emotional function, physical pain, physical health, role function, social function, mental health, energy, and general health scores in the two groups were increased, and the research group was higher than the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the research group was lower than it was in the control group, but the nursing satisfaction was higher than it was in the control group (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The high-quality nursing model based on low-frequency pulse electrical stimulation combined with early systemic functional exercise can effectively promote the functional recovery of the affected limb in brachial plexus injury patients. It can reduce pain and the incidence of complications and it can improve the quality of life and the satisfaction with the nursing at the same time.

摘要

目的

探讨采用低频脉冲电刺激联合早期全身功能锻炼的优质护理模式对臂丛神经损伤患者患肢功能的影响。

方法

选取我院收治的98例臂丛神经损伤患者作为研究队列。所有患者均根据病情接受手术修复、松解、神经移位或移植治疗。术后,将患者随机分为两组:对照组(n = 49)和研究组(n = 49)。对照组进行早期全身功能锻炼,研究组在进行早期全身功能锻炼的基础上给予低频脉冲电刺激。比较两组的临床疗效、治疗前后的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、臂丛神经功能评分、神经传导速度和波幅、SF - 36问卷评分、并发症发生率及护理满意度。

结果

治疗后,研究组的治疗总有效率显著高于对照组(95.92%对81.63%,P < 0.05)。两组的VAS评分均降低,且研究组的评分低于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组的上肢、下肢及整个臂丛神经评分均升高,且研究组的评分高于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组尺神经和正中神经的运动传导速度、感觉传导速度及波幅均升高,且研究组的水平高于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组的情感功能、躯体疼痛、生理健康、角色功能、社会功能、心理健康、精力及总体健康评分均升高,且研究组高于对照组(P < 0.05)。研究组的并发症发生率低于对照组,但护理满意度高于对照组(均P < 0.05)。

结论

基于低频脉冲电刺激联合早期全身功能锻炼的优质护理模式可有效促进臂丛神经损伤患者患肢功能恢复。它可减轻疼痛、降低并发症发生率,同时提高生活质量和护理满意度。

相似文献

2
Does Brachial Plexus Blockade Result in Improved Pain Scores After Distal Radius Fracture Fixation? A Randomized Trial.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1247-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4735-1. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
3
[C5-6 nerve root block technique for postoperative analgesia of shoulder arthroscope: a randomized controlled trial].
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Feb 18;51(1):177-181. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.01.030.
5
QUALITY OF LIFE AND UPPER LIMB FUNCTION OF CHILDREN WITH NEONATAL BRACHIAL PLEXUS PALSY.
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2020 Mar 9;38:e2018304. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2018304. eCollection 2020.
7
Analgesic effect of Ropivacaine combined with Dexmedetomidine on brachial plexus block.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0570-0.
8
Unilateral Brachial Plexus Lesion Impairs Bilateral Touch Threshold.
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 13;10:872. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00872. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of high-quality nursing on neurological function psychological moods quality of life of elderly patients with stroke.
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 16;14:1259737. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1259737. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

4
Evaluation of functional outcomes after brachial plexus injury.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Jan;45(1):28-33. doi: 10.1177/1753193419879645. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Long-term disuse of the hand affects motor imagery ability in patients with complete brachial plexus palsy.
Neuroreport. 2019 Apr 10;30(6):452-456. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001229.
6
Role of surgery in radiation induced brachial plexus neuropathy.
Neurol India. 2019 Jan-Feb;67(Supplement):S53-S54. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.250717.
8
Restoring movements at the shoulder joint in pan-brachial plexus injuries: Focusing on the complex kinesiology.
Neurol India. 2019 Jan-Feb;67(Supplement):S27-S28. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.250711.
9
Somatosensory evoked potential: Preventing brachial plexus injury in transaxillary robotic surgery.
Laryngoscope. 2019 Nov;129(11):2663-2668. doi: 10.1002/lary.27611. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
10
The Effects of Electrical Stimulation Parameters in Managing Spasticity After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;98(6):484-499. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001064.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验