Deng Y, Li Y, Yao Y, Feng D D, Xu M
Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Feb 18;51(1):177-181. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.01.030.
To compare the effects of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block and C5-6 nerve root block for analgesia after shoulder arthroscopy.
In the study, 40 patients of ASA I-II were selected for elective general anesthesia to repair the shoulder ligament rupture in Peking University Third Hospital, who were randomly divided into two groups, respectively for the intermuscular brachial plexus block group (group I) and C5-6 nerve root block group (group C), n=20. The forty patients underwent ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block or C5-6 nerve root block before general anesthesia. Group I: 0.2% ropivacaine 10 mL was injected into brachial plexus intermuscular approach; Group C: 0.2% ropivacaine 10 mL was injected around the nerve roots of C5 and C6, and the ultrasound images showed that the liquid wrapped nerve roots. The time of sensory and motor block after puncture, operation time, the time of postoperative analgesia, numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively and the finger movements were recorded. The adverse drug reactions and the patient satisfaction were recorded. The primary end point was the study of shoulder rest and movement pain in the patients with postoperative nerve blockage; the secondary end point was the patient's limb movements and thepatient satisfaction.
The duration of analgesia was (571.50±70.11) min in group I and (615.60±112.15) min in group C, and there was no difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The static and dynamic NRS scores at 1, 6, and 12 h in group C were lower than those in group I (P<0.05). There was no difference in static and dynamic NRS scores between the two groups during 24 hours (P>0.05). There was a significant difference in grade of muscle strength between group C [5(4,5)] and group I [4(2,4)] in the patients with nerve block hind limb (P<0.01), and there were significant differences between the two groups' sensation in the radial nerve group C [1(0,2)] and group I [2(1,2)], the median nerve group C [0(0,2)] and group I [2(1,2)], and the ulnar nerves group C [0(0,1)] and group I [1(1,2)] (P<0.01). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the sencation of the shoulder, group C 2(1,2) and group I 2(1,2) , P>0.05. Compared with group I 8(6,9), group C 9(8,10) was a significant difference in satisfaction (P<0.01).
Interscalene brachial plexus block and C5-6 nerve root block could satisfy the needs of analgesia after shoulder arthroscopy, but C5-6 nerve root blockage does not limit the limb activity, the numbness is less, and the patient's satisfaction is higher.
比较超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞与C5-6神经根阻滞用于肩关节镜术后镇痛的效果。
本研究选取北京大学第三医院40例ASA I-II级择期全身麻醉下行肩关节韧带修补术的患者,随机分为两组,分别为肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞组(I组)和C5-6神经根阻滞组(C组),每组20例。40例患者在全身麻醉前均接受超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞或C5-6神经根阻滞。I组:采用肌间沟入路向臂丛神经注射0.2%罗哌卡因10 mL;C组:在C5和C6神经根周围注射0.2%罗哌卡因10 mL,超声图像显示液体包绕神经根。记录穿刺后感觉和运动阻滞时间、手术时间、术后镇痛时间、术后1、6、12和24 h的数字评分量表(NRS)评分以及手指活动情况。记录药物不良反应和患者满意度。主要终点是研究术后神经阻滞患者的肩部静息和活动疼痛;次要终点是患者的肢体活动和患者满意度。
I组镇痛时间为(571.50±70.11)min,C组为(615.60±112.15)min,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C组术后1、6和12 h的静息和动态NRS评分低于I组(P<0.05)。两组术后24 h静息和动态NRS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。神经阻滞后患侧肢体肌力分级C组[5(4,5)]与I组[4(2,4)]差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),两组桡神经感觉C组[1(0,2)]与I组[2(1,2)]、正中神经C组[0(0,2)]与I组[2(1,2)]、尺神经C组[0(0,1)]与I组[1(1,2)]差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组肩部感觉差异无统计学意义,C组2(1,2),I组2(1,2),P>0.05。C组满意度为9(8,10),与I组8(6,9)相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。
肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞和C5-6神经根阻滞均可满足肩关节镜术后镇痛需求,但C5-6神经根阻滞不限制肢体活动,麻木感较轻,患者满意度较高。