Finet Shannon E, Southey Bruce R, Rodriguez-Zas Sandra L, He Fei, de Godoy Maria R C
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jun 4;8:668288. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.668288. eCollection 2021.
Although dietary fiber is not considered an essential nutrient in a complete and balanced diet for felines, it provides a substrate for fermentation by gut microbiota, thus promoting gastrointestinal health through the production of fermentative metabolites, as well as improving laxation. The aim of this research was to evaluate the novel fiber source, grass (), in comparison with traditional fiber sources and their effects on fecal quality, apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD), fecal fermentative end products, and microbiota of healthy adult cats. Four dietary treatments were evaluated, differing in dietary fiber source. The diets were formulated to meet or exceed the AAFCO (2018) nutritional profile for adult cats and contained either cellulose (CO), grass fiber (MF), a blend of fiber and tomato pomace (MF + TP), or beet pulp (BP). The study was conducted using a completely randomized design with 28 neutered adult, domesticated shorthair cats (19 females and 9 males, mean age 2.2 ± 0.03 years; mean body weight 4.6 ± 0.7 kg, mean body condition score 5.6 ± 0.6). The experimental period comprised 21 days, and a fresh fecal and a total fecal collection were performed during the last 4 days of the trial period. Daily food intake (DM basis) was similar across all groups ( > 0.05). Additionally, treatment did not affect fecal output (as-is or DM basis), fecal score, or fecal pH ( > 0.05). Cats fed BP had significantly higher total dietary fiber ATTD than all the other treatments ( < 0.05) and the highest concentrations of total short-chain fatty acid, acetate, and propionate ( < 0.05), while butyrate concentrations were similar for all treatments ( > 0.05). Inclusion of dietary fibers was effective in modulating gut microbiota. Cats fed diets containing grass had greater α-diversity than cats fed BP. As no adverse effects on health, fecal quality, or ATTD of macronutrients were observed with the inclusion of 9% grass fiber or fiber blend, the data suggest that grass fiber and fiber blends are viable alternatives to the traditional dietary fiber sources used in commercial extruded feline diets, being most comparable to cellulose.
尽管膳食纤维在猫科动物完整均衡的饮食中不被视为必需营养素,但它为肠道微生物群的发酵提供了底物,从而通过产生发酵代谢产物促进胃肠道健康,并改善排便情况。本研究的目的是评估新型纤维来源——草(),并与传统纤维来源进行比较,以及它们对健康成年猫粪便质量、表观总肠道消化率(ATTD)、粪便发酵终产物和微生物群的影响。评估了四种不同膳食纤维来源的饮食处理。这些饮食的配方符合或超过了美国饲料管理协会(2018)成年猫的营养标准,分别含有纤维素(CO)、草纤维(MF)、纤维与番茄渣的混合物(MF + TP)或甜菜粕(BP)。该研究采用完全随机设计,使用了28只绝育的成年家养短毛猫(19只雌性和9只雄性,平均年龄2.2±0.03岁;平均体重4.6±0.7千克,平均身体状况评分5.6±0.6)。实验期为21天,在试验期的最后4天进行了新鲜粪便和总粪便收集。所有组的每日食物摄入量(以干物质计)相似(P>0.05)。此外,处理对粪便产量(原样或干物质计)、粪便评分或粪便pH值没有影响(P>0.05)。喂食BP的猫的总膳食纤维ATTD显著高于所有其他处理(P<0.05),并且总短链脂肪酸、乙酸盐和丙酸盐的浓度最高(P<0.05),而所有处理的丁酸盐浓度相似(P>0.05)。膳食纤维的添加有效地调节了肠道微生物群。喂食含草饮食的猫比喂食BP的猫具有更高的α多样性。由于添加9%的草纤维或纤维混合物对健康、粪便质量或常量营养素的ATTD没有观察到不良影响,数据表明草纤维和纤维混合物是商业挤压猫粮中使用的传统膳食纤维来源的可行替代品,与纤维素最具可比性。