• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者的主动脉瓣选择

Aortic valve selection in the elderly patient.

作者信息

Borkon A M, Soule L M, Baughman K L, Baumgartner W A, Gardner T J, Watkins L, Gott V L, Hall K A, Reitz B A

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 Sep;46(3):270-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65924-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65924-3
PMID:3415376
Abstract

To determine the influence of valve selection on valve-related morbidity and mortality and patient survival, comparative long-term performance characteristics of mechanical (N = 68) and bioprosthetic (N = 73) heart valves were analyzed for 141 patients more than 70 years old who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement between 1970 and 1985. Cumulative patient follow-up was 491 patient-years (average, 4.3 years per patient). Hospital mortality was 18% and 19% for patients with mechanical valves and bioprosthetic valves, respectively. Survival at 5 years was 61 +/- 7% (+/- the standard error) and 67 +/- 10% for recipients of mechanical valves and bioprosthetic valves, respectively. Male sex (p = 0.014) and urgency of operation (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. Atrial fibrillation increased valve-related mortality (p = 0.01). No patient required reoperation or experienced structural valve failure. While anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was increased in recipients of mechanical valves (9.2 +/- 2.1%/patient-year) compared with recipients of bioprosthetic valves (2.3 +/- 1.1%/patient-year), it did not result in a death or lead to permanent disability. There was no difference in freedom from any valve-related complication at 5 years. However, when all morbid events are considered, recipients of bioprosthetic valves experienced fewer valve-related complications than patients receiving mechanical valves (10.7 +/- 2.3%/patient-year versus 17.6 +/- 2.5%/patient-year, respectively; p less than 0.05). The reduced incidence of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage and the infrequent need for warfarin sodium anticoagulation favor selection of a bioprosthetic heart valve in patients older than 70 years.

摘要

为确定瓣膜选择对瓣膜相关发病率、死亡率及患者生存率的影响,对1970年至1985年间接受单纯主动脉瓣置换术的141例70岁以上患者的机械瓣膜(N = 68)和生物瓣膜(N = 73)的长期性能特征进行了比较分析。患者累计随访时间为491患者年(平均每位患者4.3年)。机械瓣膜患者和生物瓣膜患者的医院死亡率分别为18%和19%。机械瓣膜和生物瓣膜接受者的5年生存率分别为61±7%(±标准误差)和67±10%。男性(p = 0.014)和手术紧迫性(p = 0.006)是医院死亡率的独立危险因素。房颤增加了瓣膜相关死亡率(p = 0.01)。没有患者需要再次手术或发生瓣膜结构故障。与生物瓣膜接受者(2.3±1.1%/患者年)相比,机械瓣膜接受者的抗凝相关出血有所增加(9.2±2.1%/患者年),但未导致死亡或永久性残疾。5年时在无任何瓣膜相关并发症方面没有差异。然而,当考虑所有不良事件时,生物瓣膜接受者比接受机械瓣膜的患者经历的瓣膜相关并发症更少(分别为10.7±2.3%/患者年和17.6±2.5%/患者年;p<0.05)。抗凝相关出血发生率的降低以及华法林钠抗凝需求的减少有利于70岁以上患者选择生物心脏瓣膜。

相似文献

1
Aortic valve selection in the elderly patient.老年患者的主动脉瓣选择
Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 Sep;46(3):270-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65924-3.
2
Preferability of bioprostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement--a comparative study between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves.生物假体用于单纯主动脉瓣置换的优越性——机械瓣膜与生物假体瓣膜的对比研究
Jpn Circ J. 1990 Feb;54(2):137-45. doi: 10.1253/jcj.54.137.
3
Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.老年患者主动脉瓣置换中生物瓣膜与机械瓣膜的比较
Circulation. 1996 Nov 1;94(9 Suppl):II121-5.
4
Bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the elderly: benefits and risks.老年人的生物瓣膜和机械瓣膜:益处与风险。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Aug;60(2 Suppl):S443-6. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00252-g.
5
Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜的对比分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987 Jul;94(1):20-33.
6
Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.美敦力汉考克二代与双叶机械主动脉瓣置换术在60岁以下患者中的中长期疗效比较:倾向匹配分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;22(3):280-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv347. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
7
Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years.主动脉瓣置换术:55至70岁患者机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜的前瞻性随机评估。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 10;54(20):1862-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.032.
8
Long-term survival and valve-related complications in young women with cardiac valve replacements.年轻女性心脏瓣膜置换术后的长期生存及瓣膜相关并发症
Circulation. 1999 May 25;99(20):2669-76. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.20.2669.
9
Comparative clinical experience with porcine bioprosthetic and St. Jude valve replacement.猪生物瓣膜置换与圣犹达瓣膜置换的临床对比经验。
Chest. 1987 Apr;91(4):503-14. doi: 10.1378/chest.91.4.503.
10
Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.中年患者机械瓣膜置换与生物瓣膜置换的比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Sep;30(3):485-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.06.013. Epub 2006 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
[Timing of reoperation of degenerated aortic and mitral bioprostheses].[退化性主动脉和二尖瓣生物假体再次手术的时机]
Z Kardiol. 2001 Dec;90(Suppl 6):70-4. doi: 10.1007/s003920170011.
2
Cardiac surgery in patients age 80 years or older.80岁及以上患者的心脏手术
Ann Surg. 1990 Jun;211(6):772-5; discussion 775-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199006000-00017.