Suppr超能文献

神经发育障碍个体、照料者和工作人员接受和承诺治疗的系统评价。

Systematic Review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Individuals with Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Caregivers, and Staff.

机构信息

The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, IL, USA.

出版信息

Behav Modif. 2022 Sep;46(5):1236-1274. doi: 10.1177/01454455211027301. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to quantitatively synthesize studies using acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders (NNDs), their parents, and staff members that support them. Thirty studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 2006 and 2020 met inclusion criteria. They were reviewed and coded on variables associated with participants' characteristics, settings, dropouts, design type, ACT procedures and measures, social validity, treatment integrity, and main findings. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) were applied to evaluate the quality of the studies. Results indicated that 20 studies used group designs and 10 studies used single-case designs. Participants with NNDs consisted predominantly of those with autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and learning disabilities. Group studies reported process and outcome measures exclusively; whereas, single-case studies also incorporated behavioral/direct measures. Overall, results showed mixed improvements across studies using indirect and direct measures. Lastly, quality assessment for group studies presented moderate or serious risk of bias and two single-case studies did not meet WWC evidence of effectiveness. Directions for future research and practice are discussed.

摘要

本综述的目的是定量综合使用接受和承诺疗法(ACT)的研究,这些研究涉及神经发育障碍(NND)个体、他们的父母和支持他们的工作人员。2006 年至 2020 年间,30 项在同行评议期刊上发表的研究符合纳入标准。对这些研究进行了审查和编码,涉及与参与者特征、环境、辍学、设计类型、ACT 程序和措施、社会有效性、治疗完整性以及主要发现相关的变量。应用了 What Works Clearinghouse(WWC)、修订后的 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB2)和干预非随机研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)来评估研究的质量。结果表明,20 项研究采用了小组设计,10 项研究采用了单一案例设计。NND 参与者主要包括自闭症谱系障碍、注意力缺陷多动障碍和学习障碍患者。小组研究仅报告了过程和结果测量;而,单一案例研究还纳入了行为/直接测量。总体而言,使用间接和直接测量的研究结果显示出混合改善。最后,小组研究的质量评估显示存在中度或严重的偏倚风险,并且两项单一案例研究不符合 WWC 的有效性证据。讨论了未来研究和实践的方向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验