• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔内脓肿治疗的改善。这是定位、引流及患者护理改善的结果,而非技术所致。

Improved treatment of intra-abdominal abscess. A result of improved localization, drainage, and patient care, not technique.

作者信息

Deveney C W, Lurie K, Deveney K E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1988 Sep;123(9):1126-30. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400330106016.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400330106016
PMID:3415465
Abstract

Outcome in patients with abdominal abscesses treated at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, between 1973 and 1978 (group 1) was compared with that in patients treated between 1981 and 1986 (group 2). Mortality was less in group 2 patients (21% vs 39% in group 1). The decrease in mortality in group 2 was accompanied by a greater percentage of successful predrainage localization (74% vs 55% in group 1), successful initial drainage (76% vs 55% in group 1), and decreased predrainage organ failure (23% vs 52% in group 1). Because failure of initial drainage and predrainage organ failure were associated with increased mortality, improvement in both of these criteria contributed substantially to the lower mortality in group 2 patients. There were no differences in mortality, in initial success in drainage, or in length of hospital stay when 29 group 2 patients who underwent percutaneous drainage were compared with 37 patients who underwent surgical drainage. Mortality (22% vs 21%) and initial success (78% vs 72%) were similar for patients who underwent surgical and percutaneous drainage, respectively. We conclude that initial success in localization and drainage of the abscess is more important than whether drainage is surgical or percutaneous.

摘要

将1973年至1978年在费城宾夕法尼亚大学接受治疗的腹部脓肿患者(第1组)的治疗结果与1981年至1986年接受治疗的患者(第2组)的结果进行了比较。第2组患者的死亡率较低(第2组为21%,第1组为39%)。第2组死亡率的降低伴随着更高比例的成功预引流定位(第2组为74%,第1组为55%)、成功初始引流(第2组为76%,第1组为55%)以及预引流器官衰竭的减少(第2组为23%,第1组为52%)。由于初始引流失败和预引流器官衰竭与死亡率增加相关,这两个标准的改善在很大程度上导致了第2组患者较低的死亡率。当将29例接受经皮引流的第2组患者与37例接受手术引流的患者进行比较时,在死亡率、初始引流成功率或住院时间方面没有差异。接受手术引流和经皮引流的患者的死亡率(分别为22%和21%)和初始成功率(分别为78%和72%)相似。我们得出结论,脓肿定位和引流的初始成功比引流是通过手术还是经皮进行更为重要。

相似文献

1
Improved treatment of intra-abdominal abscess. A result of improved localization, drainage, and patient care, not technique.腹腔内脓肿治疗的改善。这是定位、引流及患者护理改善的结果,而非技术所致。
Arch Surg. 1988 Sep;123(9):1126-30. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400330106016.
2
Percutaneous versus open operative drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses.经皮穿刺与开放性手术引流腹腔脓肿
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1992 Sep;6(3):525-44.
3
Operative vs percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses. Comparison of morbidity and mortality.
Arch Surg. 1986 Feb;121(2):141-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400020027001.
4
Surgical versus percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses.腹腔内脓肿的手术引流与经皮引流对比
Am J Surg. 1991 May;161(5):593-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90907-u.
5
Correlation of APACHE II score, drainage technique and outcome in postoperative intra-abdominal abscess.急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分、引流技术与术后腹腔内脓肿预后的相关性
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Feb;172(2):89-94.
6
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses.经皮超声引导下腹腔脓肿引流术。
Br J Surg. 1993 Mar;80(3):336-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800323.
7
Intra-abdominal abscess in the 1980s.20世纪80年代的腹腔内脓肿。
Surg Clin North Am. 1987 Jun;67(3):621-32. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)44235-0.
8
The role of percutaneous drainage of pancreatic abscesses.
Am Surg. 1987 Aug;53(8):451-5.
9
Percutaneous drainage of abscesses in patients with Crohn disease.克罗恩病患者脓肿的经皮引流
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 May;150(5):1043-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.150.5.1043.
10
Factors influencing the treatment of intra-abdominal abscesses.影响腹腔内脓肿治疗的因素。
Am J Surg. 1990 Jan;159(1):167-71. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80623-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections: results of a double-blind, randomized comparative phase III trial.厄他培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:一项双盲、随机对照III期试验的结果
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):235-45. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048551.32606.73.
2
Results of a clinical trial of clinafloxacin versus imipenem/cilastatin for intraabdominal infections.环丙沙星与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的临床试验结果。
Ann Surg. 2001 Jan;233(1):79-87. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200101000-00013.
3
Intra-abdominal abscess after blunt abdominal trauma.
钝性腹部创伤后腹腔内脓肿
Ann Surg. 1990 Jul;212(1):60-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199007000-00009.
4
Principles and limitations of operative management of intraabdominal infections.腹腔内感染手术治疗的原则与局限性
World J Surg. 1990 Mar-Apr;14(2):210-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01664875.
5
Percutaneous abscess and fluid drainage: a critical review.经皮脓肿及液体引流:一项批判性综述。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1991 May-Jun;14(3):143-57. doi: 10.1007/BF02577718.