• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环丙沙星与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的临床试验结果。

Results of a clinical trial of clinafloxacin versus imipenem/cilastatin for intraabdominal infections.

作者信息

Solomkin J S, Wilson S E, Christou N V, Rotstein O D, Dellinger E P, Bennion R S, Pak R, Tack K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0558, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2001 Jan;233(1):79-87. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200101000-00013.

DOI:10.1097/00000658-200101000-00013
PMID:11141229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1421170/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinafloxacin is a novel quinolone with wide activity against the plethora of microorganisms encountered in intraabdominal infections. This trial was performed to examine its clinical efficacy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Clinafloxacin is representative of a new class of quinolones with considerable antimicrobial activity resulting from their mechanisms of action and pharmacodynamics. There is, however, concern about specific potential toxicities, including photosensitivity.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to compare clinafloxacin with imipenem/cilastatin as adjuncts in the management of complicated intraabdominal infections.

RESULTS

Five hundred twenty-nine patients were included in the intent-to-treat population, with 312 meeting all criteria for the valid population. Patients with a wide range of infections were enrolled; perforated or abscessed appendicitis was the most common (approximately 50%). One hundred twenty-three of the 150 valid patients treated with clinafloxacin (82%) had successful outcomes, as did 130 of the 162 (80%) treated with imipenem. For the intent-to-treat groups, 219 of 259 patients treated with clinafloxacin (85%) had successful outcomes, as did 219 of 270 patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin (81%). Treatment failure occurred in 39 patients who underwent drainage. There were substantially more gram-negative organisms recovered from the patients with treatment failure who were initially treated with imipenem/cilastatin.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study clearly demonstrate the safety and efficacy of clinafloxacin in the treatment of a range of intraabdominal infections, and in patients with a broad range of physiologic disturbances.

摘要

目的

克林沙星是一种新型喹诺酮类药物,对腹腔内感染中遇到的多种微生物具有广泛活性。本试验旨在检验其临床疗效。

总结背景数据

克林沙星是一类新型喹诺酮类药物的代表,因其作用机制和药效学具有相当的抗菌活性。然而,人们对其特定的潜在毒性,包括光敏性存在担忧。

方法

本前瞻性、随机、双盲试验旨在比较克林沙星与亚胺培南/西司他丁作为辅助药物治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的效果。

结果

意向性治疗人群纳入了529例患者,其中312例符合有效人群的所有标准。纳入了各种感染的患者;穿孔性或脓肿性阑尾炎最为常见(约50%)。150例接受克林沙星治疗的有效患者中有123例(82%)取得成功结果,162例接受亚胺培南治疗的患者中有130例(80%)取得成功结果。在意向性治疗组中,259例接受克林沙星治疗的患者中有219例(85%)取得成功结果,270例接受亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗的患者中有219例(81%)取得成功结果。39例接受引流的患者治疗失败。最初接受亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗的治疗失败患者中分离出的革兰氏阴性菌明显更多。

结论

本研究结果清楚地证明了克林沙星在治疗一系列腹腔内感染以及生理紊乱范围广泛的患者中的安全性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Results of a clinical trial of clinafloxacin versus imipenem/cilastatin for intraabdominal infections.环丙沙星与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的临床试验结果。
Ann Surg. 2001 Jan;233(1):79-87. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200101000-00013.
2
Trovafloxacin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections: results of a double-blind, multicenter comparison with imipenem/cilastatin. Trovafloxacin Surgical Group.
Am J Surg. 1998 Dec;176(6A Suppl):53S-61S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00221-9.
3
Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.环丙沙星加甲硝唑与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Nov;16(5 Pt 2):551-61. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916050-00011.
4
Intravenous meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients. Meropenem Serious Infection Study Group.静脉注射美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗住院患者严重细菌感染的比较。美罗培南严重感染研究组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Sep;38(3):523-37. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.3.523.
5
Imipenem/cilastatin (1.5 g daily) versus meropenem (3.0 g daily) in patients with intra-abdominal infections: results of a prospective, randomized, multicentre trial.亚胺培南/西司他丁(每日1.5克)与美罗培南(每日3.0克)治疗腹腔内感染患者的前瞻性、随机、多中心试验结果
Scand J Infect Dis. 1997;29(5):503-8. doi: 10.3109/00365549709011863.
6
Monobactams and carbapenems for treatment of intraabdominal infections.用于治疗腹腔内感染的单环β-内酰胺类抗生素和碳青霉烯类抗生素。
Infection. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):136-47. doi: 10.1007/BF02560517.
7
Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin as empirical monotherapy for serious bacterial infections in the intensive care unit.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁作为重症监护病房严重细菌感染经验性单药治疗的比较
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000 Jun;6(6):294-302. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00082.x.
8
Biapenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: report from a Swedish Study Group.比阿培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:瑞典研究小组的报告
Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(5):507-12. doi: 10.3109/00365549609037949.
9
[Meropenem (Merrem) vs imipenem/cilastatin in hospital treatment of intra-abdominal infections. A multicenter study].[美罗培南(美平)与亚胺培南/西司他丁用于医院内腹腔感染治疗的多中心研究]
Minerva Chir. 1997 Mar;52(3):317-26.
10
A multicenter comparative study of meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗住院患者复杂性尿路感染的多中心对照研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jul;21(1):86-92. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.1.86.

引用本文的文献

1
Carbapenem Antibiotics Versus Other Antibiotics for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: a Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (PROSPERO CRD42018108854).碳青霉烯类抗生素与其他抗生素治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的患者水平荟萃分析 (PROSPERO CRD42018108854)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1208-1215. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05651-7. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
2
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020).《2020年日本脓毒症及脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》(J-SSCG 2020)
Acute Med Surg. 2021 Aug 26;8(1):e659. doi: 10.1002/ams2.659. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020).《2020年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》(J-SSCG 2020)
J Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 25;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00555-7.
4
The Need of Enterococcal Coverage in Severe Intra-Abdominal Infection: Evidence from Animal Study.严重腹腔内感染中肠球菌覆盖的必要性:来自动物研究的证据。
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 2;10(5):1027. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051027.
5
Assessment of Tedizolid Activity and Resistance Mechanisms against a Collection of spp. Causing Invasive Infections, Including Isolates Requiring an Optimized Dosing Strategy for Daptomycin from U.S. and European Medical Centers, 2016 to 2018.评估 Tedizolid 对引起侵袭性感染的 spp. 的活性和耐药机制,包括美国和欧洲医疗中心需要优化达托霉素给药策略的分离株,时间为 2016 年至 2018 年。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Mar 24;64(4). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00175-20.
6
Epidemiology of intra-abdominal infection and sepsis in critically ill patients: "AbSeS", a multinational observational cohort study and ESICM Trials Group Project.危重症患者腹腔内感染和脓毒症的流行病学:“AbSeS”,一项多中心观察性队列研究和 ESICM 临床试验组项目。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1703-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05819-3. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
7
Hyperalgesia and Persistent Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial with Perioperative COX-2 Inhibition.乳腺癌手术后的痛觉过敏和持续性疼痛:一项围手术期COX-2抑制的前瞻性随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0166601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166601. eCollection 2016.
8
Initial microbial spectrum in severe secondary peritonitis and relevance for treatment.严重继发性腹膜炎的初始微生物谱及其与治疗的相关性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 May;31(5):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1357-0. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
9
Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.加拿大外科腹腔内感染诊疗指南
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2010 Spring;21(1):11-37. doi: 10.1155/2010/580340.
10
Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review.修改后的意向治疗报告在随机对照试验中的系统评价。
BMJ. 2010 Jun 14;340:c2697. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2697.

本文引用的文献

1
Trovafloxacin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections: results of a double-blind, multicenter comparison with imipenem/cilastatin. Trovafloxacin Surgical Group.
Am J Surg. 1998 Dec;176(6A Suppl):53S-61S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00221-9.
2
In vitro activities of clinafloxacin against contemporary clinical bacterial isolates from 10 North American centers.克林沙星对来自北美10个中心的当代临床分离菌株的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 May;42(5):1274-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1274.
3
Comparative activities of clinafloxacin against gram-positive and -negative bacteria.克林沙星对革兰氏阳性菌和阴性菌的比较活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 May;42(5):1269-73. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1269.
4
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Cefepime Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.一项比较头孢吡肟加甲硝唑与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的随机双盲临床试验。头孢吡肟腹腔内感染研究组。
Arch Surg. 1997 Dec;132(12):1294-302. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430360040008.
5
Biapenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: report from a Swedish Study Group.比阿培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:瑞典研究小组的报告
Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(5):507-12. doi: 10.3109/00365549609037949.
6
In vitro susceptibility of anaerobes to quinolones in the United States.美国厌氧菌对喹诺酮类药物的体外敏感性
Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Dec;23 Suppl 1:S2-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.supplement_1.s2.
7
Management of intra-abdominal infections. The case for intraoperative cultures and comprehensive broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage. The Canadian Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.
Arch Surg. 1996 Nov;131(11):1193-201. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430230075014.
8
Results of a randomized trial comparing sequential intravenous/oral treatment with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole to imipenem/cilastatin for intra-abdominal infections. The Intra-Abdominal Infection Study Group.一项比较环丙沙星加甲硝唑序贯静脉/口服治疗与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的随机试验结果。腹腔内感染研究组。
Ann Surg. 1996 Mar;223(3):303-15. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199603000-00012.
9
Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in intra-abdominal infections requiring surgery. Meropenem Study Group.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁用于需要手术治疗的腹腔内感染。美罗培南研究组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:191-205. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.191.
10
In vivo efficacies of quinolones and clindamycin for treatment of infections with Bacteroides fragilis and/or Escherichia coli in mice: correlation with in vitro susceptibilities.喹诺酮类药物和克林霉素对小鼠体内脆弱拟杆菌和/或大肠杆菌感染的治疗效果:与体外药敏性的相关性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 May;37(5):997-1000. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.5.997.