Suppr超能文献

关于支持生态评估中故障风险分析的方法的综述。

A review about methods for supporting failure risks analysis in eco-assessment.

机构信息

Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, Via Marconi 5, Dalmine, 24044, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Jun 23;193(7):439. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09175-y.

Abstract

This paper critically reviewed 106 scientific papers proposing methods to enrich eco-assessment with failure determination and risk assessment. The provided research perspective is new and significantly different from the reviews in the literature which are mostly limited to analyse the environmental impacts of uncertainties and off-design functioning rather than the failures. The analysis, based on the contributions of the literature over more than 20 years, was carried out manually and allowed to identify and classify the application fields, the types of identifiable failures and the approaches used for their determination, for the analysis of their risk of occurrence and for their eco-assessment. The different classifications have also been intersected with each other and all the proposed approaches have been discussed in detail, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages in relation to eco-assessment. From the study emerged a growing and heterogeneous interest on the subject by the scientific community, and a certain independence of the analysed methods with respect to traditional approaches of both failure risk analysis and eco-assessment. Great attention of the methods about product functioning has been highlighted, in addition to the use of tests, simulations, FMEA (failure mode and effect analysis)-based approaches and knowledge databases to determine the failures, while statistical methods are preferred to support risks analysis and LCA (life cycle assessment) for environmental impact calculation. If, in the coming years, this argument also spreads in industry, the results provided by this review could be exploited as a first framework for practitioners.

摘要

本文批判性地回顾了 106 篇提出用失效判定和风险评估丰富生态评估方法的科学论文。所提供的研究视角是新的,与文献中的综述有很大的不同,文献中的综述大多仅限于分析不确定性和非设计功能对环境的影响,而不是失效的影响。该分析基于 20 多年来文献的贡献,是手动进行的,允许识别和分类应用领域、可识别的失效类型以及用于确定这些失效的方法,用于分析它们发生的风险以及用于它们的生态评估。不同的分类也相互交叉,所有提出的方法都进行了详细讨论,突出了它们与生态评估相关的优缺点。从研究中可以看出,科学界对这一主题的兴趣越来越大,而且分析方法相对于失效风险分析和生态评估的传统方法具有一定的独立性。除了使用测试、模拟、基于失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)的方法和知识库来确定失效之外,还强调了方法对产品功能的高度关注,而统计方法则更倾向于支持风险分析和生命周期评估(LCA)来计算环境影响。如果在未来几年,这一论点也在工业界传播,那么本综述提供的结果可以被从业者用作第一个框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4457/8222046/b8a81ecea168/10661_2021_9175_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验