Rituximab exhibits a better safety profile when used as a first line of treatment for pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus is an autoimmune disease that is challenging to treat and has few available therapeutic options. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that rituximab may be an efficacious first-line treatment in newest guidelines.

AIM

To compare the side effect profiles of rituximab administered after a course of immunosuppressant agents versus as a first-line therapy and evaluate the impact of patient characteristics and disease severity indices on occurrence of adverse effects.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 999 patients with pemphigus vulgaris who received rituximab either as a first-line treatment or after conventional adjuvant therapies. The occurrence of partial or complete remission as well as the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Smoking, pulmonary comorbidity, and mucocutaneous phenotype were associated with an increased risk of developing infectious complications by 12.49, 5.79, and 2.37 fold, respectively. These associations were more prominent among those who received rituximab after immunosuppressant agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Early use of rituximab benefits pemphigus patients, especially those with a mucocutaneous phenotype, pulmonary comorbidity, or history of smoking, and reduces their risk of infectious adverse events.