• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所客体化认知短量表(POWS)的验证

Validation of a Perception of Objectification in the Workplace Short Scale (POWS).

作者信息

Crone Lola, Brunel Lionel, Auzoult Laurent

机构信息

Laboratory Epsylon EA 4556, Department of Psychology, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Laboratory Psy-DREPI EA 7458, Department of Psychology, University Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 7;12:651071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651071. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651071
PMID:34163402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8215106/
Abstract

An increasing number of studies focus on the phenomenon of objectification in the workplace. This phenomenon reflects a process of subjection of the employee, where he is considered as an object, a mean (utilitarian) or reduced to one of his attributes. Previous studies have shown that objectification can have consequences on the workplace health or performance. Field studies are based on objectification measures based on tools whose psychometric qualities are unclear. Based on a previous workplace objectification measurement scale, we conducted a study with the aim of devising a new parsimonious scale. We present three studies which aim to validate this new scale. In the first study, an EFA and a CFA were performed in order to construct a scale and verify its structure validity. We obtained a 10-item scale reporting two factors labeled "Instrumental value" and "Powerfulness." The psychometric qualities of this scale were satisfactory, i.e., showed good internal reliability and good structural validity. In a second study, we tested the convergent and divergent validity of the scale. We observe that POWS is adequately correlated with dehumanization indicators. Finally, in a third study, we found that only powerfulness was associated with negative consequences for occupational health. This suggests that objectification is a process of social perception that contributes either to the devaluation of social agents in the workplace or to normal functioning at work.

摘要

越来越多的研究聚焦于职场中的物化现象。这种现象反映了员工被征服的过程,在此过程中,员工被视为一个物体、一种手段(功利性的)或被简化为其某一属性。先前的研究表明,物化可能会对职场健康或绩效产生影响。实地研究基于一些测量工具来衡量物化现象,但其心理测量学特性尚不清楚。基于先前的职场物化测量量表,我们开展了一项研究,旨在设计一个新的简化量表。我们呈现了三项旨在验证这个新量表的研究。在第一项研究中,进行了探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA),以构建一个量表并验证其结构效度。我们得到了一个包含10个条目的量表,该量表呈现出两个因子,分别标记为“工具性价值”和“权力感”。该量表的心理测量学特性令人满意,即具有良好的内部信度和良好的结构效度。在第二项研究中,我们测试了该量表的收敛效度和区分效度。我们观察到权力感量表(POWS)与去人性化指标有充分的相关性。最后,在第三项研究中,我们发现只有权力感与职业健康的负面后果相关。这表明物化是一种社会认知过程,它要么导致职场中社会主体的贬值,要么导致工作中的正常运转。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7e/8215106/84b9c10b9c01/fpsyg-12-651071-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7e/8215106/fb3ebe11f0a6/fpsyg-12-651071-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7e/8215106/6033d6e3f349/fpsyg-12-651071-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7e/8215106/84b9c10b9c01/fpsyg-12-651071-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7e/8215106/fb3ebe11f0a6/fpsyg-12-651071-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7e/8215106/6033d6e3f349/fpsyg-12-651071-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7e/8215106/84b9c10b9c01/fpsyg-12-651071-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a Perception of Objectification in the Workplace Short Scale (POWS).工作场所客体化认知短量表(POWS)的验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 7;12:651071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651071. eCollection 2021.
2
Preliminary Evidence of EEG Connectivity Changes during Self-Objectification of Workers.工人进行自我客体化时脑电图连通性变化的初步证据。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;22(20):7906. doi: 10.3390/s22207906.
3
Can Meaning at Work Guard Against the Consequences of Objectification?工作中的意义能防范客观化的后果吗?
Psychol Rep. 2020 Jun;123(3):872-884. doi: 10.1177/0033294119826891. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
4
The development and psychometric evaluation of the Objectification Perpetration Scale.《客体化侵害量表的编制与心理测量学评估》。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jul;69(4):541-553. doi: 10.1037/cou0000607. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
5
Human "resources"? Objectification at work.人力资源?工作中的物化。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Feb;120(2):384-417. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000254. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Women as Animals, Women as Objects: Evidence for Two Forms of Objectification.女性即动物,女性即物品:两种形式的物化的证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Sep;44(9):1302-1314. doi: 10.1177/0146167218765739. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
7
The nullifying experience of self-objectification: The development and psychometric evaluation of the Self-Objectification Scale.自我客体化的消除体验:自我客体化量表的编制与心理测量学评估。
Child Abuse Negl. 2016 Oct;60:46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
Internalizing objectification: Objectified individuals see themselves as less warm, competent, moral, and human.内化客体化:被客体化的个体认为自己在温暖、能力、道德和人性方面较差。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;56(2):217-232. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12188. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
Validation of the Chinese Version of the Self-Objectification Beliefs and Behaviors Scale.自我客体化信念与行为量表中文版的效度验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 24;12:724187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724187. eCollection 2021.
10
The ACME shop: A paradigm to investigate working (self-) objectification.ACME商店:一种研究工作(自我)客体化的范式。
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Sep 3;161(5):526-542. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1845592. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Can Meaning at Work Guard Against the Consequences of Objectification?工作中的意义能防范客观化的后果吗?
Psychol Rep. 2020 Jun;123(3):872-884. doi: 10.1177/0033294119826891. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
2
On the Nature of Objectification: Implications of Considering People as Means to Goals.论客观化的本质:将人视为达到目的的手段所产生的影响。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;12(5):719-730. doi: 10.1177/1745691617691138. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
3
Internalizing objectification: Objectified individuals see themselves as less warm, competent, moral, and human.
内化客体化:被客体化的个体认为自己在温暖、能力、道德和人性方面较差。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;56(2):217-232. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12188. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
Work and freedom? Working self-objectification and belief in personal free will.工作与自由?工作中的自我物化与对个人自由意志的信念。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;56(2):250-269. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12172. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
5
When less equal is less human: Intragroup (dis)respect and the experience of being human.当平等缺失意味着人性缺失:群体内的(不)尊重与人性体验。
J Soc Psychol. 2016 Sep-Oct;156(5):553-63. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1135865. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
6
Dehumanization in Medicine: Causes, Solutions, and Functions.医学中的去人性化:原因、解决方案和功能。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Mar;7(2):176-86. doi: 10.1177/1745691611429706.
7
Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action.具身认知与行动经济
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;1(2):110-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00008.x.
8
Dehumanization in organizational settings: some scientific and ethical considerations.组织环境中的非人性化:一些科学与伦理考量
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 24;8:748. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00748. eCollection 2014.
9
The costs of cooperation: action-specific perception in the context of joint action.合作的代价:联合行动背景下的特定行动感知
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):429-44. doi: 10.1037/a0033850. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
10
Getting a tool gives wings: overestimation of tool-related benefits in a motor imagery task and a decision task.获得工具如添翼:在运动想象任务和决策任务中对与工具相关益处的高估。
Psychol Res. 2014 Jan;78(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0485-9. Epub 2013 Feb 9.