Chen Sijing, Liu Jianwei, Hu Huamin
School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 7;12:659218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659218. eCollection 2021.
Data were collected from 896 participants in three Chinese cities affected by the COVID-19 pandemic to varying degrees through an online survey platform. A conditional process model was then proposed for the impact of optimistic bias on self-protection behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of social norms. Statistical analysis demonstrates that optimistic bias has a negative impact on self-protection behaviors through message acceptance. Perceived social norms moderate this relationship in the following ways: (1) The higher the perceptions of social norms, the smaller the negative impact of optimistic bias on message acceptance, and the smaller the positive impact of message acceptance on self-protection behaviors. (2) Within a certain range, the higher the perceptions of social norms, the smaller the negative impact, both direct and indirect, of optimistic bias on self-protection behaviors. (3) The direct and indirect effects of optimistic bias on self-protection behaviors become insignificant when perceptions of social norms are very strong. Comparing the data of the three cities shows that higher risk is associated with a stronger role of social norms in moderating the relationship between optimistic bias and self-protection behaviors. The above results suggest that there may be both internal (optimistic bias) and external (social norms) reference points in individual decision-making regarding health behaviors. The theoretical and practical significance of the dual reference points are discussed.
通过在线调查平台,从受新冠疫情影响程度不同的中国三个城市的896名参与者中收集了数据。然后,从社会规范的角度,提出了一个条件过程模型,用于研究乐观偏差在新冠疫情期间对自我保护行为的影响。统计分析表明,乐观偏差通过信息接受对自我保护行为产生负面影响。感知到的社会规范以以下方式调节这种关系:(1)对社会规范的感知越高,乐观偏差对信息接受的负面影响越小,信息接受对自我保护行为的积极影响也越小。(2)在一定范围内,对社会规范的感知越高,乐观偏差对自我保护行为的直接和间接负面影响越小。(3)当对社会规范的感知非常强烈时,乐观偏差对自我保护行为的直接和间接影响变得不显著。比较三个城市的数据表明,风险越高,社会规范在调节乐观偏差与自我保护行为之间关系方面的作用越强。上述结果表明,在个体关于健康行为的决策中,可能存在内部(乐观偏差)和外部(社会规范)参考点。讨论了双重参考点的理论和实践意义。