Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Health Commun. 2013;28(2):146-58. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.664805. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
Using two-wave panel survey data (N = 348) collected in South Korea in the context of H1N1 flu, we explored several important aspects of optimistic bias that have been relatively unexplored in previous research, including: (a) the extent to which risk communication and indirect risk experience affect changes in optimistic bias over time; (b) the utility of the concept of optimistic bias to predict subsequent risk behavior; and (c) how optimistic bias moderates the effect of risk communication and indirect risk experience on self-protection behavior. The findings revealed that optimistic bias is rather enduring and resilient, as it changed only under one condition (high indirect risk experience combined with low interpersonal communication). Optimistic bias had a nonsignificant association with self-protection behavior, but played an important moderating role by reducing the effect of interpersonal communication on self-protection behavior.
利用在韩国 H1N1 流感背景下收集的两波面板调查数据(N=348),我们探讨了乐观偏见的几个重要方面,这些方面在以前的研究中相对没有得到探索,包括:(a)风险沟通和间接风险体验在多大程度上影响乐观偏见随时间的变化;(b)乐观偏见的概念对预测后续风险行为的有用性;以及(c)乐观偏见如何调节风险沟通和间接风险体验对自我保护行为的影响。研究结果表明,乐观偏见相当持久和有弹性,因为它仅在一种情况下发生变化(高间接风险体验与低人际沟通相结合)。乐观偏见与自我保护行为之间没有显著关联,但通过降低人际沟通对自我保护行为的影响,起到了重要的调节作用。