Suppr超能文献

大型合奏与管弦乐队后调性音乐中的重复与审美判断

Repetition and Aesthetic Judgment in Post-tonal Music for Large Ensemble and Orchestra.

作者信息

Touizrar Moe, Knoll Anna Lena, Siedenburg Kai

机构信息

Finnish Centre for Interdisciplinary Music Research, Department of Music, Art and Culture Studies, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 7;12:673706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673706. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Post-tonal music often poses perceptual and cognitive challenges for listeners, potentially related to the use of relatively uncommon and unfamiliar musical material and compositional processes. As a basic compositional device, repetition affects memory for music and is structured by composers in very different ways across tonal and post-tonal musical repertoires. Of particular concern is whether post-tonal music exhibits mnemonic affordances that allow listeners to experience a sense of global coherence, and whether repetition correlates strongly with aesthetic judgment. Although previous research suggests that repetition impacts aesthetic preference, empirical research has not mapped out the relationship between repetition and aesthetic judgments across a broad set of post-tonal music. Presenting 14 excerpts, grouped into three categories: tonal, modernist, and post-1970, we observed that indications of repetitions in the music for a group of 60 listeners, with and without musical training, showed significant periods of interindividual synchronization. Aesthetic judgments were assessed by means of ratings for the following parameters: familiarity with the piece, confidence of repetition responses, judgments of affordances for easy listening, coherence, similarity of moments, and recognition, as well as listeners' liking and interest. A principal component analysis (PCA) on the joint question data and the repetition responses suggested that two factors account for 92% of variance in the data. These factors were interpreted as dominated by aesthetic judgment and repetition strength. Linear mixed-effects regression indicated that repetition strength generally differed across excerpt category, with modernist excerpts featuring lower repetition strength compared to both post-1970 and tonal excerpts. Aesthetic preference, on the other hand, was lower for excerpts in both the modernist and post-1970 categories when compared to tonal excerpts. The analysis did not reveal difference in response behavior for repetition responses as a function of musical training, though it indicated higher preference of modernist excerpts with increasing levels of musical training. Overall, the results suggest that the two factors, aesthetic judgment and repetition strength, act as independent determinants in the experience of post-tonal music.

摘要

后调性音乐常常给听众带来感知和认知上的挑战,这可能与相对不常见和不熟悉的音乐素材及创作过程的运用有关。作为一种基本的创作手段,重复影响着对音乐的记忆,并且在调性音乐和后调性音乐曲目中,作曲家以非常不同的方式构建重复。特别值得关注的是,后调性音乐是否展现出能让听众体验到整体连贯性的记忆特性,以及重复是否与审美判断密切相关。尽管先前的研究表明重复会影响审美偏好,但实证研究尚未全面勾勒出广泛的后调性音乐中重复与审美判断之间的关系。我们呈现了14段音乐摘录,分为三类:调性的、现代主义的和1970年后的,观察到对于60名有或没有音乐训练的听众而言,音乐中重复的迹象显示出显著的个体间同步期。通过对以下参数的评分来评估审美判断:对作品的熟悉程度、重复反应的置信度、易于聆听的特性判断、连贯性、片段相似性以及识别度,还有听众的喜好和兴趣。对联合问题数据和重复反应进行的主成分分析(PCA)表明,两个因素解释了数据中92%的方差。这些因素被解释为主要受审美判断和重复强度主导。线性混合效应回归表明,重复强度通常因摘录类别而异,与1970年后的和调性的摘录相比,现代主义摘录的重复强度较低。另一方面,与调性摘录相比,现代主义和1970年后类别中的摘录的审美偏好较低。分析未揭示出重复反应的行为因音乐训练而存在差异,不过表明随着音乐训练水平的提高,对现代主义摘录的偏好更高。总体而言,结果表明审美判断和重复强度这两个因素在后调性音乐体验中作为独立的决定因素起作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99d6/8215669/d7935d04ca4d/fpsyg-12-673706-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Repetition and Aesthetic Judgment in Post-tonal Music for Large Ensemble and Orchestra.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 7;12:673706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673706. eCollection 2021.
2
Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Oct;147(10):1531-1543. doi: 10.1037/xge0000474. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
3
The feeling of familiarity for music in patients with a unilateral temporal lobe lesion: A gating study.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Oct;77:313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
4
"Beauty Is How You Feel Inside": Aesthetic Judgments Are Related to Emotional Responses to Contemporary Music.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 13;11:510029. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.510029. eCollection 2020.
5
Listeners remember music they like.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):700-16. doi: 10.1037/a0029671. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
6
From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: towards a unified theory of musical emotions.
Phys Life Rev. 2013 Sep;10(3):235-66. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 29.
7
Discrimination of tonal and atonal music in congenital amusia: The advantage of implicit tasks.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 May;85:10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.027. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
8
Neurodiversity, Giftedness, and Aesthetic Perceptual Judgment of Music in Children with Autism.
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 22;8:1595. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01595. eCollection 2017.
9
What Determines the Perception of Segmentation in Contemporary Music?
Front Psychol. 2020 May 28;11:1001. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01001. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Western listeners detect boundary hierarchy in Indian music: a segmentation study.
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82629-y.
2
The musicality of non-musicians: an index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e89642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089642. eCollection 2014.
3
Exposure effects on music preference and recognition.
Mem Cognit. 1998 Sep;26(5):884-902. doi: 10.3758/bf03201171.
4
The role of theories in conceptual coherence.
Psychol Rev. 1985 Jul;92(3):289-316.
5
Memory for musical surface.
Mem Cognit. 1991 Jul;19(4):401-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03197145.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验