Babic Benjamin, Müller Dolores T, Gebauer Florian, Schiffmann Lars Mortimer, Datta Rabi R, Schröder Wolfgang, Bruns Christiane J, Leers Jessica M, Fuchs Hans F
Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne 50931, Germany.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):612-624. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i6.612.
There is no established correlation between 24-h esophageal pH-metry (Eso-pH) and the new laryngopharyngeal pH-monitoring system (Restech) as only small case series exist. Eso-pH was not designed to detect laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and Restech may detect LPR better. We have previously published a dataset using the two techniques in a large patient collective with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Anatomically, patients after esophagectomy were reported to represent an ideal human reflux model as no reflux barrier exists.
To use a human reflux model to examine our previously published correlation in these patients.
Patients after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy underwent our routine follow-up program with surveillance endoscopies, computed tomography scans and further exams following surgery. Only patients with a complete check-up program and reflux symptoms were offered inclusion into this prospective study and evaluated using Restech and simultaneous Eso-pH. Subsequently, the relationship between the two techniques was evaluated.
A total of 43 patients from May 2016 - November 2018 were included. All patients presented with mainly typical reflux symptoms such as heartburn (74%), regurgitation (84%), chest pain (58%), and dysphagia (47%). Extraesophageal symptoms such as cough, hoarseness, asthma symptoms, and globus sensation were also present. Esophageal 24-hour pH-metry was abnormal in 88% of patients with a mean DeMeester Score of 229.45 [range 26.4-319.5]. Restech evaluation was abnormal in 61% of cases in this highly selective patient cohort. All patients with abnormal supine LPR were also abnormal for supine esophageal reflux measured by conventional Eso-pH.
Patients following esophagectomy and reconstruction with gastric interposition can ideally serve as a human reflux model. Interestingly, laryngopharyngeal reflux phases occur mainly in the upright position. In this human volume-reflux model, results of simultaneous esophageal and laryngopharyngeal (Restech) pH-metry showed 100% correlation as being explicable by one of our reflux scenarios.
24小时食管pH监测(Eso-pH)与新型喉咽pH监测系统(Restech)之间尚无既定的相关性,因为仅有小病例系列报道。Eso-pH并非设计用于检测喉咽反流(LPR),而Restech可能能更好地检测LPR。我们之前已发表了一个在大量胃食管反流病患者群体中使用这两种技术的数据集。从解剖学角度来看,食管切除术后的患者被认为是理想的人体反流模型,因为不存在反流屏障。
利用人体反流模型来检验我们之前在这些患者中发表的相关性。
接受艾弗·刘易斯食管切除术的患者接受我们的常规随访计划,包括术后监测内镜检查、计算机断层扫描及其他检查。只有完成全面检查计划且有反流症状的患者才被纳入这项前瞻性研究,并使用Restech和同步Eso-pH进行评估。随后,评估这两种技术之间的关系。
共纳入了2016年5月至2018年11月的43例患者。所有患者主要表现为典型的反流症状,如烧心(74%)、反流(84%)、胸痛(58%)和吞咽困难(47%)。也存在诸如咳嗽声嘶、哮喘症状和咽部异物感等食管外症状。88%的患者食管24小时pH监测异常,平均DeMeester评分为22,9.45[范围26.4 - 319.5]。在这个高度选择性的患者队列中,61%的病例Restech评估异常。所有仰卧位LPR异常的患者,其仰卧位食管反流经传统Eso-pH测量也异常。
食管切除术后用胃代食管重建的患者可理想地作为人体反流模型。有趣的是,喉咽反流阶段主要发生在直立位。在这个人体大容量反流模型中,同步食管和喉咽(Restech)pH监测结果显示100%的相关性,这可由我们的一种反流情况来解释。