• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喉咽反流疾病24小时双探头pH测量的临床研究

[Clinical research of 24-hour double-probe pH-metry in the laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases].

作者信息

OUYANG Tianbin, TANG Shi-xiong, ZHANG Li-tao, YAO Shou-guo, ZHANG Xu-qun, LU Xu, CHEN Xing

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ningbo no.1 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;47(4):320-3.

PMID:22800352
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical value of 24 h double-probe pH-metry for the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

METHODS

According to the pH-metry results (whether the reflux events record in the upper esophagus is more than 6.9), patients of refractory pharyngolaryngitis were divided into LPR and control groups (each of 17 cases). All patients treated with anti-acid therapy and conventional pharyngo-laryngitis therapy. Correlation between pH-metry and the reflux symptom index (RSI), the reflux symptom index (RFI) were analyzed. Changes of the RSI and RFI in different group were calculated in post-treatment.

RESULTS

In the LPR group, the median reflux events of the upright time were higher than the supine time (Z = -3.62, P < 0.01), but the difference was not discovered in the control group (Z = -0.60, P > 0.05). There was no statistical difference between RSI, RSI and RFS with pH-metry, and with moderate concordance (k were 0.47, 0.53, P < 0.01, respectively). Compared to pre-treatment, the RSI and RFI were decreased both in LPR group and control group, Amplitude decreased in LPR group significantly higher than the control groups, with statistical difference (t were 3.74, 3.01, P < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The 24 h double-probe pH-metry is significant for the anti-acid therapy of LPR.

摘要

目的

探讨24小时双探头pH监测在喉咽反流(LPR)诊断及治疗中的临床价值。

方法

依据pH监测结果(食管上段反流事件记录pH值是否大于6.9),将难治性咽炎患者分为LPR组和对照组(每组各17例)。所有患者均接受抗酸治疗及常规咽炎治疗。分析pH监测与反流症状指数(RSI)、反流因子指数(RFI)之间的相关性。计算治疗后不同组RSI和RFI的变化。

结果

LPR组直立位反流事件中位数高于仰卧位(Z = -3.62,P < 0.01),而对照组未发现差异(Z = -0.60,P > 0.05)。pH监测与RSI、RFI之间无统计学差异,且具有中度一致性(k分别为0.47、0.53,P < 0.01)。与治疗前相比,LPR组和对照组的RSI和RFI均降低,LPR组下降幅度显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t分别为3.74、3.01,P < 0.01)。

结论

24小时双探头pH监测对LPR的抗酸治疗具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
[Clinical research of 24-hour double-probe pH-metry in the laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases].喉咽反流疾病24小时双探头pH测量的临床研究
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;47(4):320-3.
2
The value of routine pH monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux.常规 pH 监测在咽喉反流病诊断和治疗中的价值。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jun;146(6):952-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599812436952. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
3
Simultaneous laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring (Restech) and conventional esophageal pH monitoring-correlation using a large patient cohort of more than 100 patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.使用超过100例疑似胃食管反流病患者的大型队列进行同步咽喉部pH监测(Restech)与传统食管pH监测的相关性研究。
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Oct 1;31(10). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy018.
4
LPR: how different diagnostic tools shape the outcomes of treatment.喉咽反流:不同诊断工具如何影响治疗结果
J Voice. 2014 May;28(3):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
5
Chronic pharyngitis is associated with severe acidic laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with Reinke's edema.慢性咽炎与任克氏水肿患者的严重酸性喉咽反流有关。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Nov;120(11):722-6. doi: 10.1177/000348941112001105.
6
[A pilot study on diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease by pH monitoring in laryngopharynx].[一项通过咽喉pH监测诊断喉咽反流病的初步研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Mar 25;88(12):805-8.
7
The comparison of an empiric proton pump inhibitor trial vs 24-hour double-probe Ph monitoring in laryngopharyngeal reflux.经验性质子泵抑制剂试验与24小时双探头pH监测在喉咽反流中的比较。
J Laryngol Otol. 2003 May;117(5):386-90. doi: 10.1258/002221503321626438.
8
Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux among globus patients.咽异感症患者中喉咽反流的诊断
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jan;134(1):81-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.025.
9
[Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) in patients with persistent hoarseness].[持续性声音嘶哑患者的喉咽反流(LPR)]
Otolaryngol Pol. 2012 Jan-Feb;66(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6657(12)70746-1.
10
Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Comparison between 24-hour pH-Impedance Testing and Pharyngeal Probe (Restech) Testing, with Introduction of the Sataloff Score.诊断喉咽反流:24 小时 pH-阻抗测试与咽部探头(Restech)测试的比较,并引入 Sataloff 评分。
J Voice. 2023 Sep;37(5):737-747. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Study to Draw a Normative Database of Laryngopharynx pH Profile in Chinese.一项建立中国人正常喉咽 pH 值数据库的研究。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jul 31;20(3):347-51. doi: 10.5056/jnm13138.