Suppr超能文献

分次倍频1064/532纳米皮秒钕:钇铝石榴石激光与非剥脱性分次1540纳米铒玻璃激光治疗面部萎缩性瘢痕的比较:一项随机、半脸、双盲试验

Comparison of fractionated frequency-doubled 1,064/532 nm picosecond Nd:YAG lasers and non-ablative fractional 1,540 nm Er: glass in the treatment of facial atrophic scars: a randomized, split-face, double-blind trial.

作者信息

Shi Yu, Jiang Wencai, Li Wei, Zhang Wei, Zou Ying

机构信息

Department of Medical Cosmetology, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Department of Skin, and Cosmetic Research Department, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2021 May;9(10):862. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1715.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laser treatment of acne scars is common, but quality evidence on its efficacy is still needed. Our study aimed to compare picosecond laser and non-ablative fractional laser's efficacy and safety in treating acne atrophic scars.

METHODS

This was a randomized, split-face double-blind trial recruiting patients with acne atrophic scars. Facial halves were randomly divided and treated with fractionated frequency-doubled 1,064/532 nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser or non-ablative fractional 1,540 nm Er: glass laser. ECCA score (echelle d'evaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acne) and skin flatness measured with a non-invasive phaseshift rapid in vivo measurement of skin (PRIMOS) system were evaluated one month after the last treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-two Fitzpatrick skin type IV patients were included in this study, with an average age of 29.68 years, an average duration of acne scars of 8.8 years. Picosecond laser impacted all acne scar types (before and after treatment; P=0.000 for all types, P<0.001 for V-type, P=0.002 for U-type, and P=0.021 for M-type) and more pronounced effect on ECCA score than non-ablative laser for V-type and U-type acne scars. After treatment, each treatment site's height was significantly lower than that before treatment (P=0.041) in the picosecond group but not in the non-ablative group (P=0.785). The reported erythema rate was higher in patients treated with a picosecond laser, while edema, exudation, purpura, pain, and long-term AEs were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractionated frequency-doubled 1,064/532 nm Picosecond Nd: YAG laser showed better efficacy in treating acne atrophic scars than the alternative and provided satisfactory safety with added improvement in pores and the glossiness of the skin.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100045982 (comparison of fractionated frequency-doubled 1,064/532 nm picosecond Nd: YAG lasers and nonablative fractional 1,540 nm Er: glass in the treatment of facial atrophic scar: a randomized, split-face, double-blind controlled trial).

摘要

背景

激光治疗痤疮瘢痕很常见,但仍需要关于其疗效的高质量证据。我们的研究旨在比较皮秒激光和非剥脱性分数激光治疗痤疮萎缩性瘢痕的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项招募痤疮萎缩性瘢痕患者的随机、半脸双盲试验。面部两侧随机分组,分别用倍频1,064/532 nm皮秒钕:钇铝石榴石激光或非剥脱性分数1,540 nm铒玻璃激光治疗。在最后一次治疗后1个月,评估ECCA评分(痤疮瘢痕临床评估量表)和使用非侵入性相移快速活体皮肤测量(PRIMOS)系统测量的皮肤平整度。

结果

本研究纳入了22例Fitzpatrick IV型皮肤患者,平均年龄29.68岁,痤疮瘢痕平均病程8.8年。皮秒激光对所有类型的痤疮瘢痕均有影响(治疗前后;所有类型P = 0.000,V型P < 0.001,U型P = 0.002,M型P = 0.021),对于V型和U型痤疮瘢痕,皮秒激光对ECCA评分的影响比非剥脱性激光更显著。治疗后,皮秒激光组每个治疗部位的高度显著低于治疗前(P = 0.041),而非剥脱性激光组则无显著差异(P = 0.785)。皮秒激光治疗患者的红斑发生率较高,而两组之间的水肿、渗出、紫癜、疼痛和长期不良事件相似。

结论

倍频1,064/532 nm皮秒钕:钇铝石榴石激光在治疗痤疮萎缩性瘢痕方面比另一种激光显示出更好的疗效,并提供了令人满意的安全性,同时在毛孔和皮肤光泽度方面有额外改善。

注册号

ChiCTR2100045982(倍频1,064/532 nm皮秒钕:钇铝石榴石激光与非剥脱性分数1,540 nm铒玻璃治疗面部萎缩性瘢痕的比较:一项随机、半脸、双盲对照试验)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b1/8184496/10622f2d5fcc/atm-09-10-862-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验