Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, NYU Langone Health and School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health and School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2022 Feb;48(1):e12746. doi: 10.1111/nan.12746. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
Hippocampal findings are implicated in the pathogenesis of sudden unexplained death in childhood (SUDC), although some studies have identified similar findings in sudden explained death in childhood (SEDC) cases. We blindly reviewed hippocampal histology in SUDC and SEDC controls.
Hippocampal haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides (n = 67; 36 SUDC, 31 controls) from clinical and forensic collaborators were evaluated by nine blinded reviewers: three board-certified forensic pathologists, three neuropathologists and three dual-certified neuropathologists/forensic pathologists.
Among nine reviewers, about 50% of hippocampal sections were rated as abnormal (52.5% SUDC, 53.0% controls), with no difference by cause of death (COD) (p = 0.16) or febrile seizure history (p = 0.90). There was little agreement among nine reviewers on whether a slide was within normal range (Fleiss' κ = 0.014, p = 0.47). Within reviewer groups, there were no findings more frequent in SUDC compared with controls, with variability in pyramidal neuron and dentate gyrus findings. Across reviewer groups, there was concordance for bilamination and granule cell loss. Neither SUDC (51.2%) nor control (55.9%) slides were considered contributory to determining COD (p = 0.41).
The lack of an association of hippocampal findings in SUDC and controls, as well as inconsistency of observations by multiple blinded reviewers, indicates discrepancy with previous studies and an inability to reliably identify hippocampal maldevelopment associated with sudden death (HMASD). These findings underscore a need for larger studies to standardise evaluation of hippocampal findings, identifying the range of normal variation and changes unrelated to SUDC or febrile seizures. Molecular studies may help identify novel immunohistological markers that inform on COD.
尽管一些研究在儿童猝死(SUDC)病例中发现了类似的发现,但海马体的发现与儿童猝死的发病机制有关。我们对 SUDC 和 SEDC 对照的海马组织学进行了盲目审查。
来自临床和法医合作者的海马体苏木精和曙红(H&E)载玻片(n=67; 36 SUDC,31 对照)由九位盲审审阅者进行评估:三位董事会认证的法医病理学家,三位神经病理学家和三位双重认证的神经病理学家/法医病理学家。
在九位审阅者中,约有 50%的海马体切片被评定为异常(52.5%SUDC,53.0%对照),死因(COD)无差异(p=0.16)或热性惊厥病史(p=0.90)。九位审阅者中几乎没有一位认为幻灯片在正常范围内(Fleiss'κ=0.014,p=0.47)。在审阅者组内,SUDC 与对照组相比,没有发现更频繁的锥体神经元和齿状回发现。在审阅者组之间,存在双分层和颗粒细胞丢失的一致性。SUDC(51.2%)和对照(55.9%)幻灯片均未被认为有助于确定 COD(p=0.41)。
SUDC 和对照组的海马体发现之间缺乏关联,以及多位盲审审阅者的观察结果不一致,表明与以前的研究存在差异,并且无法可靠地识别与猝死相关的海马体发育不良(HMASD)。这些发现强调需要进行更大规模的研究来标准化评估海马体发现,确定正常变化范围以及与 SUDC 或热性惊厥无关的变化。分子研究可能有助于确定新的免疫组织化学标记物,为 COD 提供信息。