Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 21, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland.
Forensic Medicine Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, FI-00271, Finland.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Jun;20(2):724-735. doi: 10.1007/s12024-023-00672-9. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
While there has been notable research activity in the field of clinical neuropathology over the recent years, forensic approaches have been less frequent. This scoping literature review explored original research on forensic neuropathology over the past decade (January 1, 2010, until February 12, 2022) using the MEDLINE database. The aims were to (1) analyze the volume of research on the topic, (2) describe meta-level attributes and sample characteristics, and (3) summarize key research themes and methods. Of 5053 initial hits, 2864 fell within the target timeframe, and 122 were included in the review. Only 3-17 articles were published per year globally. Most articles originated from the Europe (39.3%) and Asia (36.1%) and were published in forensic journals (57.4%). A median sample included 57 subjects aged between 16 and 80 years. The most common research theme was traumatic intracranial injury (24.6%), followed by anatomy (12.3%) and substance abuse (11.5%). Key methods included immunotechniques (31.1%) and macroscopic observation (21.3%). Although a number of novel findings were reported, most were of preliminary nature and will require further validation. In order to reach breakthroughs and validate novel tools for routine use, more research input is urged from researchers across the world. It would be necessary to ensure appropriate sample sizes and make use of control groups.
近年来,临床神经病理学领域的研究活动引人注目,而法医方法的研究则较少。本范围界定文献综述使用 MEDLINE 数据库探讨了过去十年(2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 2 月 12 日)法医神经病理学的原始研究。目的是:(1)分析该主题的研究量;(2)描述元水平属性和样本特征;(3)总结关键研究主题和方法。在 5053 个初始命中中,2864 个符合目标时间范围,122 个纳入综述。全球每年仅发表 3-17 篇文章。大多数文章来自欧洲(39.3%)和亚洲(36.1%),并发表在法医期刊上(57.4%)。中位数样本包括 57 名年龄在 16 至 80 岁之间的受试者。最常见的研究主题是创伤性颅内损伤(24.6%),其次是解剖学(12.3%)和药物滥用(11.5%)。关键方法包括免疫技术(31.1%)和宏观观察(21.3%)。尽管报告了一些新的发现,但大多数都是初步的,需要进一步验证。为了取得突破并验证常规使用的新工具,需要来自世界各地的研究人员提供更多的研究投入。有必要确保适当的样本量并利用对照组。