• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交网络较大的人语音识别能力更差。

People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition.

机构信息

Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Mar;75(3):450-460. doi: 10.1177/17470218211030798. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1177/17470218211030798
PMID:34165366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8793288/
Abstract

The way we process language is influenced by our experience. We are more likely to attend to features that proved to be useful in the past. Importantly, the size of individuals' social network can influence their experience, and consequently, how they process language. In the case of voice recognition, having a larger social network might provide more variable input and thus enhance the ability to recognise new voices. On the other hand, learning to recognise voices is more demanding and less beneficial for people with a larger social network as they have more speakers to learn yet spend less time with each. This paper tests whether social network size influences voice recognition, and if so, in which direction. Native Dutch speakers listed their social network and performed a voice recognition task. Results showed that people with larger social networks were at learning to recognise voices. Experiment 2 replicated the results with a British sample and English stimuli. Experiment 3 showed that the effect does not generalise to voice recognition in an unfamiliar language suggesting that social network size influences attention to the linguistic rather than non-linguistic markers that differentiate speakers. The studies thus show that our social network size influences our inclination to learn speaker-specific patterns in our environment, and consequently, the development of skills that rely on such learned patterns, such as voice recognition.

摘要

我们处理语言的方式受到我们经验的影响。我们更有可能关注过去证明有用的特征。重要的是,个体的社交网络规模可以影响他们的经验,进而影响他们处理语言的方式。在语音识别的情况下,拥有更大的社交网络可能会提供更多变化的输入,从而提高识别新声音的能力。另一方面,对于社交网络较大的人来说,学习识别声音的要求更高,收益更小,因为他们需要学习的说话者更多,但与每个说话者相处的时间更少。本文测试了社交网络规模是否会影响语音识别,如果会,影响的方向如何。荷兰母语者列出了他们的社交网络,并完成了一项语音识别任务。结果表明,社交网络较大的人在学习识别声音方面存在困难。实验 2 用英国样本和英语刺激物重复了这一结果。实验 3 表明,这种效应不会推广到不熟悉语言的语音识别,这表明社交网络规模影响对语言而非区分说话者的非语言标记的注意力。因此,这些研究表明,我们的社交网络规模影响我们在环境中学习说话者特定模式的倾向,从而影响依赖于这些习得模式的技能的发展,例如语音识别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91a/8793288/7dcf75858938/10.1177_17470218211030798-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91a/8793288/e91b45bd2da8/10.1177_17470218211030798-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91a/8793288/7dcf75858938/10.1177_17470218211030798-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91a/8793288/e91b45bd2da8/10.1177_17470218211030798-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91a/8793288/7dcf75858938/10.1177_17470218211030798-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
People with larger social networks show poorer voice recognition.社交网络较大的人语音识别能力更差。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Mar;75(3):450-460. doi: 10.1177/17470218211030798. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
2
The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification.熟悉和不熟悉声音的处理:说话人识别和辨认的特定神经反应。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250214. eCollection 2021.
3
The influence of social network size on speech perception.社交网络规模对言语感知的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2249-2260. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739865. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
Language-familiarity effect on voice recognition by blind listeners.盲听人群对语音识别的语言熟悉度效应。
JASA Express Lett. 2021 May;1(5):055201. doi: 10.1121/10.0004848.
5
Social network size can influence linguistic malleability and the propagation of linguistic change.社交网络规模会影响语言的可塑性和语言变化的传播。
Cognition. 2018 Jul;176:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.无论你说什么:FMRI 对声音学习和识别的相关性与语音内容无关。
Cortex. 2017 Sep;94:100-112. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
7
Human voice recognition depends on language ability.人类的语音识别依赖于语言能力。
Science. 2011 Jul 29;333(6042):595. doi: 10.1126/science.1207327.
8
How the Size of Our Social Network Influences Our Semantic Skills.我们社交网络的规模如何影响我们的语义技能。
Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;40(8):2050-2064. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12317. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
9
Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.梯度语言优势影响说话者学习。
Cognition. 2014 Jan;130(1):85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
10
Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.内隐语音学习能否改善口语加工?对临床实践的启示。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 May 17;61(5):1251-1260. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0298.

引用本文的文献

1
Voice Recognition and Evaluation of Vocal Music Based on Neural Network.基于神经网络的声乐语音识别与评价
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 20;2022:3466987. doi: 10.1155/2022/3466987. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
How Long Does It Take for a Voice to Become Familiar? Speech Intelligibility and Voice Recognition Are Differentially Sensitive to Voice Training.声音需要多长时间才能变得熟悉?言语可懂度和语音识别对语音训练的敏感性不同。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Jun;32(6):903-915. doi: 10.1177/0956797621991137. Epub 2021 May 12.
2
How in-group bias influences the level of detail of speaker-specific information encoded in novel lexical representations.内群体偏见如何影响新词汇表征中编码的特定说话者信息的详细程度。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 May;46(5):894-906. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000765. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
The influence of social network size on speech perception.
社交网络规模对言语感知的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2249-2260. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739865. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
Another bilingual advantage? Perception of talker-voice information.双语的另一个优势?对说话者声音信息的感知。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2018 May;21(3):523-536. doi: 10.1017/S1366728917000153. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
Understanding the mechanisms of familiar voice-identity recognition in the human brain.理解人类大脑中熟悉声音识别的机制。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 31;116(Pt B):179-193. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
6
Abstraction and the (Misnamed) Language Familiarity Effect.抽象与(误称的)语言熟悉度效应。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Mar;42(2):633-645. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12520. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
7
How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction.社交网络异质性如何促进词汇获取和词汇预测。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):528-538. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0675-y.
8
Reading ability influences native and non-native voice recognition, even for unimpaired readers.阅读能力会影响对母语和非母语语音的识别,即使对于未受损的读者也是如此。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jan;139(1):EL6-12. doi: 10.1121/1.4937488.
9
How the Size of Our Social Network Influences Our Semantic Skills.我们社交网络的规模如何影响我们的语义技能。
Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;40(8):2050-2064. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12317. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
10
A language-familiarity effect for speaker discrimination without comprehension.在没有理解的情况下,说话者辨别中的语言熟悉度效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 23;111(38):13795-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401383111. Epub 2014 Sep 8.