基于离散选择实验的偏好型青光眼效用量表的开发与验证。

Development and Validation of a Preference-Based Glaucoma Utility Instrument Using Discrete Choice Experiment.

机构信息

Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.

Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug 1;139(8):866-874. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1874.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

A glaucoma-specific instrument for estimating utilities across the spectrum of glaucoma severity is currently lacking, hindering the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of glaucoma treatments.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate the preference-based Glaucoma Utility Instrument (Glau-U) and to ascertain the association between Glau-U utilities and severity of glaucoma and vision impairment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 stages at the Singapore National Eye Centre glaucoma clinics. Stage 1 focused on the identification and pretesting of the Glau-U attributes and was carried out between June 2009 and May 2016. Stage 2 involved the development and administration of the discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey and tasks and was conducted between May 7, 2018, and December 11, 2019. Stage 2 participants were English- or Mandarin-speaking Singaporean citizens or permanent residents of Chinese, Malay, or Indian ethnicity who were 40 years or older and had a clinical diagnosis of glaucoma in at least 1 eye.

EXPOSURES

Glau-U comprised 6 quality-of-life attributes: activities of daily living, lighting and glare, movement, eye discomfort, other effects of glaucoma, and social and emotional effects. The descriptions or response options for these attributes were no difficulty or never, some difficulty or sometimes, or severe difficulty or often.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Utility weights for Glau-U were developed using a DCE questionnaire, which was interviewer administered to participants. Mixed logit regression determined utility weights for each health state. Glau-U utility weights across better- or worse-eye glaucoma and vision impairment severity were calculated using 1-way analysis of variance. Correlations between Glau-U utilities and better- or worse-eye visual fields and EuroQol 5-Dimension utilities were ascertained to assess convergent and divergent validity.

RESULTS

Of the 304 participants (mean [SD] age, 68.3 [8.7] years; 182 men [59.9%]), 281 (92.4%) had no vision impairment in the better eye, 13 (4.3%) had mild impairment, and 10 (3.3%) had moderate to severe vision impairment. Mean (SD) Glau-U utilities decreased as better-eye glaucoma severity increased (none: 0.73 [0.21]; mild: 0.66 [0.21]; moderate: 0.66 [0.20]; severe: 0.60 [0.28]; and advanced or end-stage: 0.22 [0.38]; P < .001), representing reductions of 20.7% to 76.1% in quality-adjusted life-years compared with a health state that included preperimetric glaucoma. Mean (SD) Glau-U utilities also decreased as better-eye vision impairment worsened from 0.67 (0.23) for none to 0.58 (0.32) for mild to 0.46 (0.29) for moderate to severe vision impairment. Glau-U utilities demonstrated moderate correlations with better-eye (r = 0.34; P < .001) and worse-eye (r = 0.33; P < .001) mean deviation scores and low correlations with EuroQol 5-Dimension utilities (r = 0.22; P < .001), supporting convergent and divergent validity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Use of Glau-U revealed large decrements in utility that were associated with late-stage glaucoma, suggesting that this new instrument may be useful for cost-effectiveness analyses of interventions and informing resource allocation policies for glaucoma and vision loss.

摘要

重要性

目前缺乏专门用于评估青光眼严重程度范围内效用的青光眼专用工具,这阻碍了青光眼治疗成本效益的评估。

目的

开发和验证基于偏好的青光眼效用工具(Glau-U),并确定 Glau-U 效用与青光眼严重程度和视力损害之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究分两个阶段在新加坡国家眼科中心的青光眼诊所进行。第 1 阶段专注于 Glau-U 属性的识别和预测试,于 2009 年 6 月至 2016 年 5 月进行。第 2 阶段涉及离散选择实验(DCE)调查和任务的开发和管理,于 2018 年 5 月 7 日至 2019 年 12 月 11 日进行。第 2 阶段的参与者是讲英语或普通话的新加坡公民或中国、马来或印度族裔的永久居民,年龄在 40 岁或以上,至少有 1 只眼被诊断为青光眼。

暴露

Glau-U 由 6 个生活质量属性组成:日常生活活动、照明和眩光、运动、眼部不适、青光眼的其他影响以及社会和情感影响。这些属性的描述或响应选项是无困难或从不、有些困难或有时、或严重困难或经常。

主要结果和措施

使用 DCE 问卷开发了 Glau-U 的效用权重,该问卷由访谈员向参与者进行管理。混合对数回归确定了每个健康状况的效用权重。使用方差分析计算了更好眼或更差眼青光眼和视力损害严重程度的 Glau-U 效用权重。确定了 Glau-U 效用与更好眼或更差眼视野和 EuroQol 5 维度效用之间的相关性,以评估收敛和发散有效性。

结果

在 304 名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,68.3[8.7]岁;182 名男性[59.9%])中,281 名(92.4%)更好眼没有视力损害,13 名(4.3%)有轻度损害,10 名(3.3%)有中度至重度视力损害。随着更好眼青光眼严重程度的增加,Glau-U 的平均(标准差)效用降低(无:0.73[0.21];轻度:0.66[0.21];中度:0.66[0.20];重度:0.60[0.28];晚期或终末期:0.22[0.38];P<.001),与包括前视路青光眼在内的健康状态相比,质量调整生命年的减少幅度为 20.7%至 76.1%。随着更好眼视力损害从无(0.67[0.23])恶化到轻度(0.58[0.32])、中度(0.46[0.29])和重度(0.46[0.29]),Glau-U 的平均(标准差)效用也降低。Glau-U 效用与更好眼(r=0.34;P<.001)和更差眼(r=0.33;P<.001)平均偏差评分有中度相关性,与 EuroQol 5 维度效用有低度相关性(r=0.22;P<.001),支持收敛和发散有效性。

结论和相关性

使用 Glau-U 显示,随着青光眼进入晚期,效用大幅下降,表明这种新工具可能对青光眼和视力丧失干预措施的成本效益分析有用,并为青光眼和视力丧失的资源分配政策提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索