• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人和儿童对相邻和非相邻依存关系的同时视觉学习。

Concurrent visual learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies in adults and children.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2021 May;57(5):733-748. doi: 10.1037/dev0000998.

DOI:10.1037/dev0000998
PMID:34166018
Abstract

Concurrent learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies has been shown in adults only. This study extended this line of research by examining dependency-specific learning for both adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies concurrently in both adults and children. Seventy adults aged 18 to 64 (40 women, 30 men; Experiment 1) and 64 children aged 10 to 11 years (40 girls, 24 boys; Experiment 2) were tested with a new serial reaction time (SRT) task in which they were trained for 5-8 min on materials comprising equally probable adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies. They were then asked to discriminate between trained and untrained dependencies in a familiarity task. Both adults and children showed implicit concurrent learning of both adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies. The two dependency types were learned to the same extent. However, adults showed a rapid, sustainable, and dependency-specific sensitivity throughout the SRT task while children only showed a dependency-specific sensitivity to violations of expectations after exposure. When the two groups were statistically compared, only adults showed a dependency-specific learning effect after exposure. These findings are in line with the age-related improvement model of dependency learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

成年人仅在相邻和非相邻依存关系的并发学习中表现出来。本研究通过同时检查成年人和儿童对相邻和非相邻依存关系的依存关系特异性学习,扩展了这一研究思路。70 名 18 至 64 岁的成年人(40 名女性,30 名男性;实验 1)和 64 名 10 至 11 岁的儿童(40 名女孩,24 名男孩;实验 2)在一个新的序列反应时间(SRT)任务中接受了测试,他们在 5-8 分钟的时间内接受了包含同等概率的相邻和非相邻依存关系的材料训练。然后,他们在熟悉度任务中被要求区分训练和未训练的依存关系。成年人和儿童都表现出对相邻和非相邻依存关系的隐性并发学习。两种依存关系类型的学习程度相同。然而,成年人在 SRT 任务中表现出快速、可持续和依存关系特异性的敏感性,而儿童仅在暴露后对违反预期的情况表现出依存关系特异性敏感性。当对这两个组进行统计比较时,只有成年人在暴露后表现出依存关系特异性学习效应。这些发现与依存关系学习的年龄相关改善模型一致。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Concurrent visual learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies in adults and children.成人和儿童对相邻和非相邻依存关系的同时视觉学习。
Dev Psychol. 2021 May;57(5):733-748. doi: 10.1037/dev0000998.
2
Distinct neural networks for detecting violations of adjacent versus nonadjacent sequential dependencies: An fMRI study.检测相邻与非相邻序列依赖违反情况的不同神经网络:一项 fMRI 研究。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020 Mar;169:107175. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107175. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
3
Is an attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning valid?基于注意力的相邻和非相邻依赖学习的关联解释是否有效?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 May;157:195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
4
Nonadjacent Dependency Learning in Cantonese-Speaking Children With and Without a History of Specific Language Impairment.有和没有特定语言障碍史的粤语儿童的非相邻依存学习
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Mar 1;60(3):694-700. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0232.
5
Implicit learning of second-, third-, and fourth-order adjacent and nonadjacent sequential dependencies.二阶、三阶和四阶相邻及非相邻序列依赖性的内隐学习。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Mar;61(3):400-24. doi: 10.1080/17470210701210999.
6
Nonhuman primates learn adjacent dependencies but fail to learn nonadjacent dependencies in a statistical learning task with a salient cue.非人类灵长类动物在具有显著提示的统计学习任务中可以学习相邻依赖性,但无法学习非相邻依赖性。
Learn Behav. 2022 Jun;50(2):242-253. doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00485-2. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
7
Learning nonadjacent dependencies embedded in sentences of an artificial language: When learning breaks down.学习人工语言句子中嵌入的非相邻依存关系:当学习出现障碍时。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(4):604-614. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000483. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
8
Statistically based chunking of nonadjacent dependencies.基于统计的非相邻依存关系切分。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Nov;151(11):2623-2640. doi: 10.1037/xge0001207. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
9
Bridging the gap: Learning of acoustic nonadjacent dependencies by a songbird.弥合差距:鸣禽对声学非相邻依赖关系的学习
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(3):295-302. doi: 10.1037/xan0000145.
10
Formal language hierarchy reflects different levels of cognitive complexity.正式语言层级反映了不同认知复杂度的层次。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Apr;49(4):642-660. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001182. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning Type I and Type II regularities between multiple sequentially presented stimulus categories.学习多个连续呈现的刺激类别之间的I型和II型规律。
Psychol Res. 2025 Sep 18;89(5):144. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02180-7.
2
Incidental auditory category learning and visuomotor sequence learning do not compete for cognitive resources.偶发性听觉类别学习和视觉运动序列学习不会争夺认知资源。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb;85(2):452-462. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02616-x. Epub 2022 Dec 12.