Wasmund W C, Tate T F
United Methodist Children's Home, Worthington, OH.
Child Welfare. 1988 Jul-Aug;67(4):291-9.
Better than age, experience, or education, this research found that personality characteristics differentiated child care workers from the general population. Ten of the 16 primary 16PF scores were significantly different and generally described an altruistic but assertive and venturesome propensity to manage others. The linear specification equation that summarized these personality differences also differentiated most from least effective child care workers: Low scores were associated with dependence and "job/person mismatch"; high-scores were associated with independence and assertiveness and, sometimes, unmanageability and "incompatible attitudes." Five 16PF factors differentiated most from least effective child care workers: Warmth (A+), intelligence (B+), assertiveness (E+), social reservation (H-), and conservatism (Q1-). Although child care workers were significantly bolder (H+) than the general population, especially effective child care workers were less bold and radical than their less effective colleagues. Both analyses identified traits similar to those that Mufson found and suggested that personality characteristics were significantly related to performance. The liner specification equation predicted correctly 63% of the time; the discriminant analysis, 70%. These equaled the classification criteria reported by supervisors from at least two agencies. Since the adjusted multiple r2 was about .25, one must wonder about the influence of other, unknown factors. Interrater reliability and varying agency performance standards may have been among those. The authors have used the 16PF for several years at the United Methodist Children's Home with very encouraging results. Although not used to select or screen applicants, the 16PF has been very helpful in reconsidering applicants who interviewed poorly or confirming those who interviewed well.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
这项研究发现,与年龄、经验或教育程度相比,人格特征更能区分儿童保育员与普通人群。在16项主要的16PF人格测试得分中,有10项存在显著差异,总体上描述了一种利他但自信且敢于冒险的管理他人的倾向。总结这些人格差异的线性回归方程也区分了最有效率和效率最低的儿童保育员:低分与依赖和“工作/人员不匹配”相关;高分与独立和自信相关,有时还与难以管理和“不相容态度”相关。五个16PF因素区分了最有效率和效率最低的儿童保育员:热情(A+)、智力(B+)、自信(E+)、社交保守性(H-)和保守主义(Q1-)。尽管儿童保育员比普通人群明显更大胆(H+),但特别高效的儿童保育员比效率较低的同事更不那么大胆和激进。两项分析都确定了与穆夫森发现的类似特征,并表明人格特征与工作表现显著相关。线性回归方程的预测准确率为63%;判别分析的预测准确率为70%。这些结果与至少两个机构的主管报告的分类标准相当。由于调整后的多重r2约为0.25,人们不禁要怀疑其他未知因素的影响。评分者间信度和不同的机构绩效标准可能是其中的因素。作者们在美国联合卫理公会儿童之家使用16PF人格测试已有数年,结果非常令人鼓舞。尽管16PF人格测试并非用于选拔或筛选求职者,但它在重新考虑面试表现不佳的求职者或确认面试表现良好的求职者方面非常有帮助。(摘要截选至250字)