Suppr超能文献

2017-2020 年台湾地区多中心抗菌药物耐药性监测(SMART)研究:头孢地尔、头孢吡肟/齐多夫定、头孢吡肟/恩他培南、奥马环素、埃拉瓦西环素和其他比较药物对碳青霉烯类药物不敏感的肠杆菌科的体外活性。

In-vitro activity of cefiderocol, cefepime/zidebactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, omadacycline, eravacycline and other comparative agents against carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales: results from the Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2017-2020.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan, and Institute of Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Sep;58(3):106377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106377. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

Abstract

This study examined the susceptibility of carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales (CNSE) to cefiderocol, cefepime/zidebactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, omadacycline, eravacycline and other comparative agents. Non-duplicate Enterobacterales isolates from 16 Taiwanese hospitals were evaluated. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method, and susceptibility results were interpreted based on relevant guidelines. In total, 201 CNSE isolates were investigated, including 26 Escherichia coli isolates and 175 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Carbapenemase genes were detected in 15.4% (n=4) of E. coli isolates and 47.4% (n=83) of K. pneumoniae isolates, with the most common being bla (79.3%, 69/87), followed by bla (13.8%, 12/87). Cefiderocol was the most active agent against CNSE; only 3.8% (n=1) of E. coli isolates and 4.6% (n=8) of K. pneumoniae isolates were not susceptible to cefiderocol. Among the carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, 88.5% (n=23) and 93.7% (n=164), respectively, were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. For cefepime/zidebactam, 23 (88.5%) E. coli isolates and 155 (88.6%) K. pneumoniae isolates had MICs ≤2/2 mg/L. For cefepime/enmetazobactam, 22 (84.6%) E. coli isolates and 85 (48.6%) K. pneumoniae isolates had MICs ≤2/8 mg/L. The higher MICs of K. pneumoniae against cefepime/enmetazobactam were due to only one (1.5%) of the 67 bla-carrying isolates being susceptible. MICs of omadacycline were significantly higher than those of eravacycline and tigecycline. In summary, cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam and cefepime/zidebactam were more effective against carbapenem-nonsusceptible E. coli and K. pneumoniae than other drugs, highlighting their potential as valuable therapeutics.

摘要

这项研究旨在评估碳青霉烯类药物不敏感的肠杆菌科细菌(CNSE)对头孢地尔、头孢吡肟/他唑巴坦、头孢吡肟/恩他培南、奥马环素、依拉环素和其他比较药物的敏感性。研究人员对来自台湾 16 家医院的非重复肠杆菌科分离株进行了评估。采用肉汤微量稀释法测定最小抑菌浓度(MIC),并根据相关指南解释药敏结果。共检测了 201 株 CNSE 分离株,包括 26 株大肠埃希菌和 175 株肺炎克雷伯菌。15.4%(n=4)的大肠埃希菌和 47.4%(n=83)的肺炎克雷伯菌分离株中检测到碳青霉烯酶基因,最常见的是 bla(79.3%,69/87),其次是 bla(13.8%,12/87)。头孢地尔对 CNSE 最具活性;仅 3.8%(n=1)的大肠埃希菌和 4.6%(n=8)的肺炎克雷伯菌分离株对头孢地尔不敏感。在碳青霉烯类耐药的大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分离株中,分别有 88.5%(n=23)和 93.7%(n=164)对头孢他啶/阿维巴坦敏感。对于头孢吡肟/他唑巴坦,23(88.5%)株大肠埃希菌和 155(88.6%)株肺炎克雷伯菌分离株的 MICs≤2/2mg/L。对于头孢吡肟/恩他培南,22(84.6%)株大肠埃希菌和 85(48.6%)株肺炎克雷伯菌分离株的 MICs≤2/8mg/L。肺炎克雷伯菌对头孢吡肟/恩他培南的 MIC 较高,是因为 67 株携带 bla 基因的分离株中只有 1 株(1.5%)敏感。奥马环素的 MIC 明显高于依拉环素和替加环素。综上所述,头孢地尔、头孢他啶/阿维巴坦和头孢吡肟/他唑巴坦对碳青霉烯类药物不敏感的大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的疗效优于其他药物,提示它们具有作为有价值的治疗药物的潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验