IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611, AX, Delft, the Netherlands.
Social Digital, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Oct 1;295:113082. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113082. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
In response to the need for approaches to understand how citizen science is currently influencing environmental policy and associated decision making, we devised the Citizen Science Impact StoryTelling Approach (CSISTA). We iteratively designed instruments to be used as tools primarily for citizen science practitioners seeking to understand or communicate policy impacts. We then trialled the CSISTA and associated instruments on four exemplary citizen science initiatives, using different forms of inquiry and collaboration with respective initiative leaders. In this paper, we present CSISTA, with details of the steps for implementing inquiry and storytelling instruments. Additionally, we reflect on insights gained and challenges encountered implementing the approach. Overall, we found the versatility and structure of CSISTA as a process with multiple guiding instruments useful. We envision the approach being helpful, particularly with regards to: 1) gaining an understanding of a citizen science initiative's policy and decision-making impacts; 2) creating short policy impact stories to communicate such impacts to broader audiences; or 3) fulfilling both goals to understand and communicate policy impacts with a unified approach. We encourage others to explore, adapt, and improve the approach. Additionally, we hope that explorations of CSISTA will foster broader discussions on how to understand and strengthen interactions between citizen science practitioners, policy makers, and decision makers at large, whether at local, national, or international scales.
为了满足了解公民科学如何影响环境政策和相关决策的需求,我们设计了公民科学影响故事讲述方法(CSISTA)。我们反复设计了工具,主要供寻求理解或传达政策影响的公民科学实践者使用。然后,我们在四个典型的公民科学计划中试用了 CSISTA 和相关工具,分别采用不同形式的调查和与各自计划领导者的合作。在本文中,我们介绍了 CSISTA,包括实施调查和讲故事工具的步骤的详细信息。此外,我们还反思了实施该方法时获得的见解和遇到的挑战。总的来说,我们发现 CSISTA 作为一个具有多种指导工具的过程具有多功能性和结构性。我们设想该方法特别有用,特别是在以下方面:1)了解公民科学计划的政策和决策影响;2)创建简短的政策影响故事,将这些影响传达给更广泛的受众;或 3)通过统一的方法实现理解和沟通政策影响的双重目标。我们鼓励其他人探索、适应和改进该方法。此外,我们希望对 CSISTA 的探索将促进更广泛的讨论,讨论如何理解和加强公民科学实践者、政策制定者和决策者之间的互动,无论是在地方、国家还是国际层面。