Suppr超能文献

开放科学的社会影响:一项范围综述

The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review.

作者信息

Cole Nicki Lisa, Kormann Eva, Klebel Thomas, Apartis Simon, Ross-Hellauer Tony

机构信息

Open and Reproducible Research Group, Sandgasse 36, 8010 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jun 27;11(6):240286. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240286. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Open Science (OS) aims, in part, to drive greater societal impact of academic research. Government, funder and institutional policies state that it should further democratize research and increase learning and awareness, evidence-based policy-making, the relevance of research to society's problems, and public trust in research. Yet, measuring the societal impact of OS has proven challenging and synthesized evidence of it is lacking. This study fills this gap by systematically scoping the existing evidence of societal impact driven by OS and its various aspects, including Citizen Science (CS), Open Access (OA), Open/FAIR Data (OFD), Open Code/Software and others. Using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews and searches conducted in Web of Science, Scopus and relevant grey literature, we identified 196 studies that contain evidence of societal impact. The majority concern CS, with some focused on OA, and only a few addressing other aspects. Key areas of impact found are education and awareness, climate and environment, and social engagement. We found no literature documenting evidence of the societal impact of OFD and limited evidence of societal impact in terms of policy, health, and trust in academic research. Our findings demonstrate a critical need for additional evidence and suggest practical and policy implications.

摘要

开放科学(OS)部分旨在推动学术研究产生更大的社会影响。政府、资助者和机构政策表明,它应进一步使研究民主化,并提高学习与认知、循证决策、研究与社会问题的相关性以及公众对研究的信任。然而,事实证明,衡量开放科学的社会影响具有挑战性,且缺乏相关综合证据。本研究通过系统梳理由开放科学及其各个方面(包括公民科学(CS)、开放获取(OA)、开放/公平数据(OFD)、开放代码/软件等)所驱动的社会影响的现有证据,填补了这一空白。利用《系统评价与Meta分析扩展版首选报告项目》(PRISMA)以及在科学网、Scopus和相关灰色文献中进行的检索,我们识别出196项包含社会影响证据的研究。其中大多数涉及公民科学,部分聚焦于开放获取,仅有少数涉及其他方面。发现的关键影响领域包括教育与认知、气候与环境以及社会参与。我们未找到记录开放/公平数据社会影响证据的文献,且在政策、健康以及对学术研究的信任方面,社会影响的证据有限。我们的研究结果表明迫切需要更多证据,并提出了实际和政策层面的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be0/11296153/69c2767831fe/rsos240286f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验