Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Promot Int. 2023 Oct 1;38(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad101.
Citizen science is rapidly gaining momentum as a means of involving members of the public in research and decision-making in disease prevention and health promotion. However, citizen science projects have predominantly been led by academic researchers and there is limited understanding of how to support the application of citizen science approaches in policy and practice settings. This study aimed to understand the perceptions, motivations and early experiences of applying citizen science approaches in policy and practice settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with policy and practice stakeholders who were leading citizen science projects (project partners, n = 7), and their implementation partners (project implementers, n = 11). Participants viewed citizen science as an opportunity to access hard-to-reach data and to enhance engagement with community members to support policy and practice change. Barriers and facilitators of citizen science in policy and practice settings included navigating collaborative relationships, team capacity and resources available to deliver projects, recruitment and engagement of citizen scientists and ethical considerations in the design and implementation of citizen science projects. Findings support the feasibility and wider application of citizen science approaches in health promotion and are being used to inform the development of tools and resources to build capacity in these approaches in policy and practice settings.
公民科学作为一种让公众参与疾病预防和健康促进研究和决策的手段,正在迅速发展。然而,公民科学项目主要由学术研究人员主导,对于如何在政策和实践环境中支持公民科学方法的应用,人们的理解有限。本研究旨在了解在政策和实践环境中应用公民科学方法的看法、动机和早期经验。对领导公民科学项目的政策和实践利益相关者(项目合作伙伴,n=7)及其实施伙伴(项目实施者,n=11)进行了半结构化访谈。参与者认为公民科学是获取难以获取的数据的机会,并增强与社区成员的互动,以支持政策和实践的改变。政策和实践环境中公民科学的障碍和促进因素包括协作关系的管理、团队能力和项目交付可用的资源、公民科学家的招募和参与,以及在公民科学项目的设计和实施中涉及到的道德考虑。研究结果支持在健康促进中应用公民科学方法的可行性和更广泛的应用,并正在用于为政策和实践环境中这些方法的能力建设开发工具和资源提供信息。