Suppr超能文献

非营利性医院的慈善医疗服务和社区公益:定义和要求。

Charity Care and Community Benefit in Non-Profit Hospitals: Definition and Requirements.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

University of Maryland Global Campus, Largo, MD, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211028180. doi: 10.1177/00469580211028180.

Abstract

Policymakers are using different ways to measure the community benefit provided by non-profit hospitals because different policy makers have different policy objectives. We compare 3 commonly used measures of community benefit; examine the correlation across the 3 measures; examine how the distribution of community benefits varies across non-profit hospitals; and compare the factors associated with the level of community benefit for each definition. The main dataset for this study is the Schedule H of IRS Form 990 data for 2017. We merged this data with the 2017 American Hospital Association (AHA), the 2017 CMS Hospital Cost Report, and the 2018 American Community Survey data. The final sample consists of 1904 non-profit hospitals. We define 3 measures of community benefit: (1) Total community benefits: combining all 17 possible measures in the 990 data; (2) Total community benefits less unreimbursed Medicaid care because it reflects a policy choice made by the state; and (3) only charity care. We also subdivided the community benefits into individual and service-based benefit. Gini Coefficients and descriptive analysis show the distribution of 3 types of community benefit measures. On average, hospitals spent 8.1% of their expenses on all community benefits; 4.3% on community benefits less unreimbursed Medicaid; and 1.7% on charity care. The provision of charity care showed more variation (Gini coefficient) than the other 2 measures. Different hospital and geographic characteristics were associated with each definition, suggesting that different types of hospitals place emphasis on different community benefits. When policy makers choose among different definitions of community benefit, they should consider what incentives they want to instill.

摘要

政策制定者正在使用不同的方法来衡量非营利性医院提供的社会效益,因为不同的政策制定者有不同的政策目标。我们比较了 3 种常用的社会效益衡量指标;考察了这 3 个指标之间的相关性;考察了社会效益在非营利性医院之间的分布差异;并比较了每个定义中与社会效益水平相关的因素。本研究的主要数据集是 2017 年 IRS 表格 990 的附表 H 数据。我们将这些数据与 2017 年美国医院协会(AHA)、2017 年 CMS 医院成本报告和 2018 年美国社区调查数据合并。最终样本包括 1904 家非营利性医院。我们定义了 3 种社会效益衡量指标:(1)总社会效益:结合 990 数据中的所有 17 种可能的措施;(2)总社会效益减去未报销的医疗补助,因为这反映了州政府的政策选择;(3)仅慈善护理。我们还将社会效益细分为个人和服务效益。基尼系数和描述性分析显示了 3 种社会效益衡量指标的分布情况。平均而言,医院将其支出的 8.1%用于所有社会效益;4.3%用于社区效益减去未报销的医疗补助;1.7%用于慈善护理。慈善护理的提供显示出比其他 2 个指标更大的变化(基尼系数)。不同的医院和地理位置特征与每个定义相关,表明不同类型的医院更注重不同类型的社会效益。当政策制定者在不同的社会效益定义之间进行选择时,他们应该考虑他们希望激发什么样的激励。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f45d/8246580/3202608c2110/10.1177_00469580211028180-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验