Ge Bai (
Hossein Zare is an assistant scientist in the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Apr;40(4):629-636. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01627.
The different tax treatment of government, nonprofit, and for-profit hospitals implies different charity care obligations, with the greatest obligation for government hospitals and the least for for-profit hospitals. Prior research has not examined charity care provision among all three ownership types at the national level. Using 2018 Medicare Hospital Cost Reports, we compared charity care provision across 1,024 government, 2,709 nonprofit, and 930 for-profit hospitals. In aggregate, nonprofit hospitals spent $2.3 of every $100 in total expenses incurred on charity care, which was less than government ($4.1) or for-profit ($3.8) hospitals. No hospital ownership type outperformed the other two types with respect to charity care provision in a majority of hospital service areas containing all three types. Using different kinds of analyses, we also found wide variation in charity care provision within ownership types and a lack of a consistent pattern across ownership types. These results suggest that many government and nonprofit hospitals' charity care provision was not aligned with their charity care obligations arising from their favorable tax treatment. Policy makers may consider initiatives to enhance hospitals' charity care provision, particularly hospitals with government and nonprofit ownership.
政府、非营利和营利性医院的不同税收待遇意味着不同的慈善医疗义务,政府医院的义务最大,营利性医院的义务最小。先前的研究尚未在全国范围内考察所有三种所有制类型的慈善医疗服务提供情况。利用 2018 年医疗保险医院成本报告,我们比较了 1024 家政府医院、2709 家非营利医院和 930 家营利性医院的慈善医疗服务提供情况。非营利性医院在总支出中每花费 100 美元就有 2.3 美元用于慈善医疗,低于政府医院(4.1 美元)或营利性医院(3.8 美元)。在包含所有三种类型的大多数医院服务区中,没有一种所有制类型在慈善医疗服务提供方面优于其他两种类型。使用不同的分析方法,我们还发现,在所有制类型内,慈善医疗服务的提供情况存在很大差异,而且所有制类型之间也没有一致的模式。这些结果表明,许多政府和非营利性医院的慈善医疗服务提供情况与其因税收优惠而产生的慈善医疗义务不一致。政策制定者可能会考虑采取措施来加强医院的慈善医疗服务提供,特别是那些具有政府和非营利性所有制的医院。