Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):107-115. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14060. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
To determine if greater non-profit hospital spending for community benefits is associated with better health outcomes in the county where they are located.
Community benefit data from IRS Form 990/Schedule H was linked to health outcome data from Area Health Resource Files, Map the Meal Gap, and Medicare claims from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services at the county level. Counties with at least one non-profit hospital in the United States from 2015 to 2019 (N = 5469 across the 5 years) were included.
We ran multiple regressions on community benefit expenditures linked with the number of health professionals, food insecurity, and adherence to diabetes and hypertension medication for each county.
The three outcomes were chosen based on prior studies of community benefit and a recent survey sent to 12 health care executives across four regions of the U.S. Data on community benefit expenditures and health outcomes were aggregated at the county level.
Average hospital community benefit spending in 2019 was $63.6 million per county ($255 per capita). Multivariable regression results did not demonstrate significant associations of total community benefit spending with food insecurity or medication adherence for diabetes. Statistically significant associations with the number of health professionals per 1000 (coefficient, 12.10; SE, 0.32; p < 0.001) and medication adherence for hypertension (marginal effect, 0.27; SE, 0.09; p = 0.003) were identified, but both would require very large increases in community benefit spending to meaningfully improve outcomes.
Despite varying levels of non-profit hospital community benefit investment across counties, higher community benefit expenditures are not associated with an improvement in the selected health outcomes at the county level. Hospitals can use this information to reassess community benefit strategies, while federal, state, and local governments can use these findings to redefine the measures of community benefit they use to monitor and grant tax exemption.
确定非营利性医院在社区福利方面的支出增加是否与其所在县的健康结果改善相关。
通过 IRS 表格 990/Schedule H 中的社区福利数据与来自各县的健康结果数据(来自区域卫生资源档案、食品缺口地图和医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的 Medicare 索赔)相关联。该研究包括 2015 年至 2019 年期间美国每个县至少有一家非营利性医院的县(5 年共 5469 个县)。
我们对与每个县的卫生专业人员数量、食品不安全和糖尿病及高血压药物依从性相关的社区福利支出进行了多项回归分析。
根据先前的社区福利研究和最近向美国四个地区的 12 位医疗保健高管发送的调查,选择了这三个结果。社区福利支出和健康结果的数据在县一级汇总。
2019 年平均医院社区福利支出为每个县 6360 万美元(每人 255 美元)。多变量回归结果表明,总社区福利支出与食品不安全或糖尿病药物依从性之间没有显著关联。与每 1000 人(系数,12.10;SE,0.32;p < 0.001)的卫生专业人员数量和高血压药物依从性(边际效应,0.27;SE,0.09;p = 0.003)存在统计学显著关联,但两者都需要大幅增加社区福利支出才能对结果产生有意义的改善。
尽管各县的非营利性医院社区福利投资水平存在差异,但较高的社区福利支出与所选县的健康结果改善无关。医院可以利用这些信息重新评估社区福利策略,而联邦、州和地方政府可以利用这些发现重新定义他们用于监测和授予免税的社区福利衡量标准。