• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者初级保健和医院保健协调的特定模式。两年(2015-2017 年)结果评估。

Specific model for the coordination of primary and hospital care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Evaluation of two-year results (2015-2017).

机构信息

Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INIBICA), Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.

Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.

出版信息

Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2021 Mar;68(3):175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.endien.2021.05.002
PMID:34167697
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent chronicdiseases and has a significant health and social impact. Strict control of blood glucose levels and other risk factors for vascular disease (VD) reduces complications and mortality and is related to the quality of care received. Although care should be interdisciplinary, based on the coordination of primary care (PC) and hospital care (HC), little information is available on the effectiveness of the different existing intervention models.

OBJECTIVE

To assess, in a population with DM from a healthcare area, the impact on health, quality of care, and effectiveness in the use of resources of a specific model of shared management of patients with DM (Instrument for Evaluation of Models of Chronic Care in Diabetes Mellitus; IEMAC-DM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A quasi-experimental before-after intervention study in patients with DM in the Cádiz-San Fernando Healthcare Area (Andalusia, Spain) that allows for identifying the capacity of the program to improve the quality indicators both in the whole population with DM and in that referred to HC. For this, a working group consisting of healthcare professionals of different profiles and care levels was set up. An initial self-assessment was done using the IEMAC-DM tool and, after analysis of the preliminary results, improvement strategies were established and implemented. Finally, the clinical and resource management results were assessed before and two years after the implementation of the model.

RESULTS

During the study period, no significant changes were seen in process indicators related to laboratory practices or examinations in the health area. The proportion of patients with acceptable metabolic control [glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level < 8%] was 49% in 2015 and 45% in 2017. The number of admissions related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke remained constant, but there was an increase in the standardized ratio of major lower limb amputations (1.5 vs. 1.9). Of the 295 patients referred from PC to HC, the proportion of adequate referrals increased from 40% in 2015 to 76% in 2017 (P = .001). In the referred patients, a significant improvement was seen in the mean difference in glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c; 1.14 ± 1.73%; 95% CI: 0.73-1.55; P = .0001) and cholesterol (11.28 ± 40 mg/dL; 95% CI: 2.07-20.48; P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that an intervention based on a chronicity care model adapted to patients with DM improves certain aspects related to the quality of care and the degree of metabolic control. Improving health outcomes will require long-term evaluation and, probably, other additional interventions.

摘要

简介

糖尿病(DM)是最常见的慢性病之一,对健康和社会有重大影响。严格控制血糖水平和血管疾病(VD)的其他风险因素可降低并发症和死亡率,并与所接受的护理质量有关。尽管护理应该是跨学科的,基于基层医疗(PC)和医院护理(HC)的协调,但对于不同现有干预模式的有效性的信息很少。

目的

在一个来自医疗保健区域的 DM 人群中,评估特定的 DM 患者共同管理模式(糖尿病慢性照护评估模型工具;IEMAC-DM)对健康、护理质量和资源利用的影响。

患者和方法

这是一项在卡迪斯-圣费尔南多医疗保健区域(西班牙安达卢西亚)的 DM 患者中进行的准实验性前后干预研究,该研究能够确定该计划提高 DM 全人群和转至 HC 人群的质量指标的能力。为此,成立了一个由不同专业和护理水平的医疗保健专业人员组成的工作组。使用 IEMAC-DM 工具进行了初始自我评估,在分析初步结果后,制定并实施了改进策略。最后,在实施模型之前和两年后评估临床和资源管理结果。

结果

在研究期间,卫生区域的实验室实践或检查相关的过程指标没有明显变化。可接受代谢控制的患者比例[糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平<8%]在 2015 年为 49%,在 2017 年为 45%。与急性心肌梗死(AMI)和中风相关的住院人数保持不变,但大下肢截肢的标准化比率有所增加(1.5 比 1.9)。在从 PC 转至 HC 的 295 名患者中,适当转诊的比例从 2015 年的 40%增加到 2017 年的 76%(P=.001)。在转诊患者中,糖化血红蛋白水平(HbA1c)的平均差异有显著改善(1.14±1.73%;95%CI:0.73-1.55;P=.0001)和胆固醇(11.28±40mg/dL;95%CI:2.07-20.48;P=.012)。

结论

本研究表明,基于适应 DM 患者的慢性病护理模型的干预可以改善与护理质量和代谢控制程度相关的某些方面。改善健康结果需要长期评估,可能还需要其他额外的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Specific model for the coordination of primary and hospital care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Evaluation of two-year results (2015-2017).糖尿病患者初级保健和医院保健协调的特定模式。两年(2015-2017 年)结果评估。
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2021 Mar;68(3):175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
2
Specific model for the coordination of primary and hospital care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Evaluation of two-year results (2015-2017).糖尿病患者初级保健和医院保健协调的特定模式。两年结果评估(2015-2017 年)。
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2021 Mar;68(3):175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2019.12.010. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
[Efficacy of the strategy to improve the quality indicators of Diabetes Mellitus 2 Care Process in Advanced Diabetes Centre Macarena].[改善马卡雷纳高级糖尿病中心2型糖尿病护理流程质量指标策略的疗效]
Aten Primaria. 2019 Jan;51(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.09.010. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
4
5
Metabolic control and chronic complications during a 3-year follow-up period in a cohort of type 2 diabetic patients attended in primary care in the Community of Madrid (Spain).在西班牙马德里自治区接受初级保健的2型糖尿病患者队列中,3年随访期内的代谢控制与慢性并发症情况。
Endocrinol Nutr. 2014 Jan;61(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
6
The status of glycemic control: A cross-sectional study of outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus across primary, secondary, and tertiary hospitals in the Jiangsu province of China.血糖控制状况:中国江苏省基层、二级和三级医院 2 型糖尿病门诊患者的横断面研究。
Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):973-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.05.002.
7
Shared medical appointments based on the chronic care model: a quality improvement project to address the challenges of patients with diabetes with high cardiovascular risk.基于慢性病护理模式的共享医疗预约:一项应对心血管高风险糖尿病患者挑战的质量改进项目。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct;16(5):349-53. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019158.
8
A cluster-randomized trial to estimate the effect of mobile screening and treatment feedback on HbA1c and diabetes-related complications in Tshwane primary health care clinics, South Africa.一项整群随机试验,旨在评估南非茨瓦内初级卫生保健诊所的移动筛查及治疗反馈对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和糖尿病相关并发症的影响。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 Dec;11(6):546-554. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
9
[Cross-sectional epidemiological study of clinical profiles and glycemic control in diabetic patients in primary care in Spain (the EPIDIAP study)].[西班牙初级保健中糖尿病患者临床特征与血糖控制的横断面流行病学研究(EPIDIAP研究)]
Endocrinol Nutr. 2009 May;56(5):233-40. doi: 10.1016/S1575-0922(09)71406-8. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
10
Importance of measuring glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with myocardial infarction and known diabetes mellitus.测量已知患有糖尿病的心肌梗死患者的糖化血红蛋白的重要性。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 15;105(8):1090-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A framework for chronic care quality: results of a scoping review and Delphi survey.慢性病护理质量框架:范围综述和德尔菲调查的结果。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2422170. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2422170. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Quality of care for chronic conditions: identifying specificities of quality aims based on scoping review and Delphi survey.慢性病护理质量:基于范围综述和德尔菲调查确定质量目标的特殊性。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2381878. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2381878. Epub 2024 Aug 16.