Suppr超能文献

测量已知患有糖尿病的心肌梗死患者的糖化血红蛋白的重要性。

Importance of measuring glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with myocardial infarction and known diabetes mellitus.

机构信息

St. Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 15;105(8):1090-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

Abstract

Although medical co-morbidities commonly affect clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), current performance measures of AMI quality focus exclusively on the management of the AMI itself. However, patients with AMIs frequently present with other co-morbidities, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), that also warrant assessment and management. To date, the quality of DM evaluation in patients presenting with AMIs has not been described. From January 2003 to June 2004, the Prospective Registry Evaluating Myocardial Infarction Patients: Events and Recovery-Quality Improvement (PREMIER-QI) enrolled 3,953 patients with AMIs at 19 centers in the United States. The frequency of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) assessment, either during the hospitalization or documented in the chart from the preceding 3 months, was prospectively evaluated. Among 1,168 patients with AMIs with preexisting DM, only 47% had recent HbA(1c) levels available, with marked variability in HbA(1c) assessment among hospitals (range 7% to 81%). Among those with available HbA(1c) levels, 39% had good control (HbA(1c) <7%), 36% had suboptimal control (HbA(1c) 7% to 9%), and 25% had poor control (HbA(1c) >9%). Patients with suboptimal and poor control were more likely to have their DM treatment intensified than those without HbA(1c) assessment (for HbA(1c) 7% to 9%, rate ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.85; for HbA(1c) >9%, rate ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.68 to 2.88). Similarly, patients with DM who had HbA(1c) measured were more likely to receive instructions on DM disease management before discharge. In conclusion, the assessment of chronic glycemic control is highly variable among patients with AMIs and DM. Because much of this variability occurs at the hospital level, the evaluation of DM control could represent an additional quality indicator and an opportunity to advance patient-centered AMI care.

摘要

虽然合并症在急性心肌梗死 (AMI) 后经常影响临床结果,但目前 AMI 质量的绩效评估仅专注于 AMI 本身的管理。然而,患有 AMI 的患者经常伴有其他合并症,如糖尿病 (DM),这也需要评估和管理。迄今为止,AMI 患者 DM 评估的质量尚未得到描述。2003 年 1 月至 2004 年 6 月,前瞻性评估心肌梗死患者事件和恢复质量改进研究 (PREMIER-QI) 在 19 个美国中心招募了 3953 例 AMI 患者。前瞻性评估糖化血红蛋白 (HbA1c) 评估的频率,无论是在住院期间还是在之前 3 个月的图表中记录。在 1168 例患有 AMI 的合并 DM 的患者中,仅有 47% 的患者最近有 HbA1c 水平,医院之间 HbA1c 评估的差异很大(范围为 7% 至 81%)。在有 HbA1c 水平的患者中,39% 的患者控制良好(HbA1c <7%),36% 的患者控制不佳(HbA1c 为 7% 至 9%),25% 的患者控制不佳(HbA1c >9%)。与没有 HbA1c 评估的患者相比,HbA1c 控制不佳和较差的患者更有可能加强 DM 治疗(对于 HbA1c 为 7% 至 9%,率比 1.38,95%置信区间 1.03 至 1.85;对于 HbA1c >9%,率比 2.20,95%置信区间 1.68 至 2.88)。同样,接受 HbA1c 测量的 DM 患者更有可能在出院前获得 DM 疾病管理的指导。总之,DM 患者的慢性血糖控制评估差异很大。由于这种差异大部分发生在医院层面,因此对 DM 控制的评估可能代表另一个质量指标,并为推进以患者为中心的 AMI 护理提供机会。

相似文献

1
Importance of measuring glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with myocardial infarction and known diabetes mellitus.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 15;105(8):1090-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
5
Glycemic control and cardiovascular events in diabetic hemodialysis patients.
Circulation. 2009 Dec 15;120(24):2421-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.857268.
7
Relation between hemoglobin a(1c) and outcomes in heart failure patients with and without diabetes mellitus.
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jun 15;109(12):1767-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.022. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
10
Prognostic value of admission plasma glucose and HbA in acute myocardial infarction.
Diabet Med. 2004 Apr;21(4):305-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01112.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between basal metabolic rate and cardio-metabolic risk factors: Evidence from a Mendelian Randomization study.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 23;10(7):e28154. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28154. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
2
Quality of Diabetes Care in the USA.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Jun 3;23(7):73. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01503-5.
4
The reliability of in-hospital diagnoses of diabetes mellitus in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2014 Nov 4;2(1):e000046. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000046. eCollection 2014.
5
Clinical significance of glycated hemoglobin in the acute phase of ST elevation myocardial infarction.
World J Cardiol. 2014 Apr 26;6(4):140-7. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i4.140.
6
Association between diabetes mellitus and angina after acute myocardial infarction: analysis of the TRIUMPH prospective cohort study.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Jun;22(6):779-87. doi: 10.1177/2047487314533622. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

2
Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2545-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
3
Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
4
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2008.
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jan;31 Suppl 1:S12-54. doi: 10.2337/dc08-S012.
5
Diabetes and mortality following acute coronary syndromes.
JAMA. 2007 Aug 15;298(7):765-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.7.765.
8
Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2643-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052187.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验