Suppr超能文献

仅阴茎体阴茎成形术:优化美学效果的技术改良

Shaft-only Phalloplasty: Technical Modifications to Optimize Aesthetics.

作者信息

Peters Blair R, McCreary Eleanor, Putnam Carley A, Berli Jens U

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oreg.

School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oreg.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jun 22;9(6):e3645. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003645. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Shaft-only phalloplasty (SOP) has been described as an alternative option for phalloplasty. Although traditional phalloplasty represents the most complete form of genital gender-affirming surgery, this variation also carries the greatest surgical risk. Patients may opt for a lower risk SOP for reasons including gender identity, gender expression, sexual function, desire for future childbearing, or minimal gender dysphoria associated with sedentary urination. Further, some patients may, due to associated co-morbidities, not be a candidate for neourethral reconstruction. Forgoing urethral reconstruction also means forgoing the presence of a distal urethral meatus and thereby compromising on one of the basic tenets of phalloplasty surgery-the aesthetic appearance. In an SOP, the flap is usually a simple tube with a purse-string suture placed at the distal end. Another concern can be the insufficient bulk of the phallus due to the absence of the volume added by the inner tube. The purpose of this article is to review our technical modifications that allow for creation of a phallic meatus as well as increasing phallic girth when needed. The most frequently described technique to create a neo-urethra is the tube-within-tube concept. We expanded on this and apply it as a short segment for distal meatal creation in an SOP. Improved aesthetics are achieved by creating the appearance of a phallic meatus and when desired, utilizing a lateral de-epithelialized strip to increase phallic bulk and girth. We hope these technical refinements can assist the surgeon in better meeting the goal of creating an aesthetically pleasing phallus.

摘要

仅阴茎体阴茎成形术(SOP)已被描述为阴茎成形术的一种替代选择。尽管传统阴茎成形术是生殖器性别确认手术最完整的形式,但这种变体也带来最大的手术风险。患者可能出于多种原因选择风险较低的SOP,这些原因包括性别认同、性别表达、性功能、未来生育意愿,或与坐位排尿相关的最小性别焦虑。此外,一些患者由于合并症可能不适合进行新尿道重建。放弃尿道重建也意味着放弃远端尿道口的存在,从而损害阴茎成形术的一个基本原则——美学外观。在SOP中,皮瓣通常是一个简单的管子,在远端放置一个荷包缝合。另一个问题可能是由于没有内管增加的体积,阴茎体的体积不足。本文的目的是回顾我们的技术改进,这些改进能够在需要时创建阴茎尿道口并增加阴茎周长。最常描述的创建新尿道的技术是管中管概念。我们在此基础上进行扩展,并将其应用于SOP中作为远端尿道口创建的短节段。通过创建阴茎尿道口的外观,并在需要时利用外侧去上皮化条带来增加阴茎体积和周长,从而实现更好的美学效果。我们希望这些技术改进能够帮助外科医生更好地实现创建一个美观阴茎的目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cdc/8219247/7a8a3f07b6fb/gox-9-e3645-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验