Suppr超能文献

农药对植绥螨(重要生物防治剂)非靶标效应的元分析与综述

Meta-analysis and review of pesticide non-target effects on phytoseiids, key biological control agents.

机构信息

Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Crop Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Wapato, WA, USA.

Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA, USA.

出版信息

Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Nov;77(11):4848-4862. doi: 10.1002/ps.6531. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

Abstract

Understanding pesticide non-target effects on natural enemies is a key element of successful conservation biological control. Due to their importance in agroecosystems worldwide, the phytoseiid mites are the most well-studied natural enemies in pesticide selectivity research. The wealth of literature associated with this topic allows for a thorough meta-analysis of pesticide non-target effects and may also indicate general trends relevant to many cropping systems. We conducted a meta-analysis using 2386 observations from 154 published papers examining the impact of pesticides on lethal (adult and juvenile mortality) and sublethal (fecundity, egg hatch) effects. Insecticides and herbicides did not statistically differ in toxicity to phytoseiids, but research on herbicide non-target effects is scarce. Specific insecticides, fungicides, and miticides were sorted into least and most harmful categories. Phytoseiid species also differed in sensitivity, with Galendromus occidentalis (Nesbitt), Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor), and Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten among the least sensitive species. Sensitivity variation may be partly due to pesticide resistance; the greatest differences between species were within older mode of action (MOA) groups, where resistance development has been documented. It has been speculated that specialist phytoseiids, which closely associate with Tetranychus spp. spider mites, have more opportunities for resistance development due to their necessary proximity to a pest that rapidly develops resistance. Effect sizes were higher for generalist phytoseiid species, supporting this hypothesis. This meta-analysis highlights pesticide types (herbicides) and MOA groups where more research is clearly needed. Our analysis also allows for more robust generalizations regarding which pesticides are harmful or selective to phytoseiids. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

摘要

了解农药对天敌的非靶标效应是成功进行保护生物防治的关键因素。由于在全球农业生态系统中的重要性,植绥螨是农药选择性研究中研究最多的天敌。与该主题相关的丰富文献允许对农药非靶标效应进行彻底的荟萃分析,并且还可能表明与许多种植系统相关的一般趋势。我们使用 154 篇已发表的论文中的 2386 个观察值进行了荟萃分析,这些论文研究了农药对致死(成虫和幼虫死亡率)和亚致死(繁殖力,卵孵化)效应的影响。杀虫剂和除草剂在对植绥螨的毒性方面没有统计学差异,但是关于除草剂非靶标效应的研究很少。特定的杀虫剂、杀菌剂和杀螨剂被分为最无害和最有害两类。植绥螨物种的敏感性也存在差异,其中西方盲走螨(Nesbitt)、加州新小绥螨(McGregor)和智利小植绥螨(Scheuten)是最不敏感的物种。敏感性变化可能部分归因于农药抗性;在旧作用模式(MOA)组内,物种之间的差异最大,其中已经记录了抗性的发展。有人推测,由于它们与迅速产生抗性的害虫密切相关,因此专门捕食植绥螨的物种具有更多的抗性发展机会。物种之间的差异更大,因为它们具有更多的机会发展抗性。该荟萃分析强调了需要更多研究的农药类型(除草剂)和 MOA 组。我们的分析还允许更有力地概括出哪些农药对植绥螨有害或具有选择性。 © 2021 化学工业协会。本文由美国政府雇员做出贡献,其工作在美国属于公有领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验